How early was Trump part of the Plan?
Feels like he'd have to be in on it waaay earlier than 10 or so years.
>Does anyone think this is going to end anytime soon, seriously, or do we have to wait till Trump returns to office in Jan 20th, 2025?
My take has always been that there will need to be overt military intervention that can secure an election. Something the public will see. Overt martial law, THEN election, then Trump.
Or
Fraud election>martial law>new election>Trump
https://youtu.be/uiX1uLwxwYc
Body Language: Trump, Ramaswamy’s endorsement
TLDR,Body Language reads that Trump does not trust Vivek at all. There's a hand gesture into his jacket pocket that implies when he used to reach for his piece of paper with the Snake poem on it.
> Keep thinking august or september if the military is going to take overt control before the election.
Sounds plausible to me. Because if there's a general election, and Trump actually wins, we still have around 2 months of Biden rule. Depending on whether or not Patriots are controlling the White house this may either be part of the movie and it transitions close to normal, or it's make or break it time for the Swamp.
> You don't engage a bunch of internet outcasts to shit post to be low key.
Yep, that's us all right. The Band of Misfit Toys
needs sauce. Feels like comms. Heads on a swivel
This. IMO The Plan is set up in such a way that it will:
-Wake normies up
-Get normies off their asses and get involved locally
-Identify their idols as traitors
-Get public support for the Military to clean house.
>>19103408 (pb dough resources)
>from BO:
>
>1. Nobody uses my admin creds but ME. Ever.
>
>2. None of your damn business what my religion is. You're making false assumptions based on projections, not evidence.
>
>3. Want a leader who hates? Sounds literally like Vader from the movies.
>
>4. The Rothschild stuff was the same old recycled shit, nothing new.
>
>5. Do what you wish, baker. Make a board, make a chan - up to you.
>
>It was your decision to put muh joos in notables. Your decision to be snarky when challenged. Most bakers say "check em" after posting notes because they want anons to give feedback. You don't seem interested. If bakers don't listen, why should anons support them?
>
>Have respect for your backing ability and the work ethic.
Why not focus on the larger goal, as outlined by Q? It was he who said, saving Israel for last.
>
>Hope you can redirect your focus. If not, wish you well on your alt platform.
>20300374
Seeing anon video re: tunnels
So, honest question here: if the tunnels are in the news, why can't we discuss them? If Israel is at war right now, why are they off topic, and could we be at the point that Israel is being saved for last?
Doesn't even need to be a discrimination thing, can't anons post their digs on the premise of it being organized crime?
My only guess is that's why we were given a vague hint not to take it. Probably was one of the messiest parts of the plan, but it sure as shit beats fighting in Stalingrad or something.
It's a war, and the enemy gets a vote too.
kek. was just about to post this. Like the trudeau processor just went into overclock mode.