Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:34 a.m. No.20312038   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2041 >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

Ultra Cowchick ❤️🇺🇸

@Cowchick4

Charlie - Do you really know who Gov Gregg Abbott is?

 

The WEF does. https://weforum.org/people/greg-abbott/

Quote

Charlie Kirk

@charliekirk11

·

Jan 25

·

NEW — There are now 25 states standing in solidarity with the great state of Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott against the lawless Joe Biden:

 

Wyoming - Gov. Mark Gordon

Iowa - Gov. Kim Reynolds

Arkansas - Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders

Montana - Gov. Greg Gianforte

Florida Gov. Ron…

Show more

4:11 AM · Jan 26, 2024

 

https://twitter.com/Cowchick4/status/1750823740496339132

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:35 a.m. No.20312041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

>>20312038

 

Sweet17

@RealSweet17

WATCH: Michael Yon Combat Correspondent has been following migrant invasion for years & explains how it all starts in Panama at Darien Gap says Gregg Abbott is WEF.

 

We just let a TERRORIST cross the U.S. border, and they're laughing at us. https://youtu.be/p_bbGRLr33Q?si=Je_1OyI_QHQCbO_p via

@YouTube

youtube.com

"We just let a TERRORIST cross the U.S. border, and they're laughing…

Tens of thousands of illegal immigrants from countries all over the world are pouring across the US southern border everyday… thousands of Chinese national…

9:49 AM · Jan 25, 2024

 

https://twitter.com/RealSweet17/status/1750546523601932360

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:36 a.m. No.20312048   🗄️.is 🔗kun

RosaryWarrior🗡🛡✝️🙏

@infidel_cracka

Look at these freemasons. Look at Elon's comment under Amber Heard's post & his mom doing her freemasonic poses. Now u know why Gregg Abbott is a WEF alum

12:46 PM · Jun 6, 2023

 

https://twitter.com/infidel_cracka/status/1666139569530470405

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:37 a.m. No.20312049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2065 >>2164 >>2172 >>2221 >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY 6

@Michael_Yon

The Invasion Continues with Direct Aiding and Abetting by WEF/CCP lieutenant Texas “Governor” Gregg Abbott. Abbott is as corrupt as the Bidens and accepts money from the Operation. Such as $1.4m from William Harris, who is building a Colonia for about 200,000 aliens in Liberty County north of Houston.

 

Call things, people, and situations, by their proper names.

 

The invaders are future warriors and slaves of WEF/CCP. Abbott is doing nothing. This is Kayfabe.

 

@annvandersteel

@Andrew_W_MG

@GenFlynn

 

@JackPosobiec

 

@BensmanTodd

 

@realmuckraker

 

https://youtu.be/mTboxwnt6EY

2:43 AM · Jul 22, 2023

·

 

https://twitter.com/Michael_Yon/status/1682657663597916163

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:39 a.m. No.20312052   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2058 >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

Sally

@TalkWithSally

Is Greg Abbott simply placating Texas with his letter? He has had years to secure the border why now? Watch this video from Redacted And let me know your thoughts.

 

Is Greg Abbott part of the WEF?

4:53 PM · Jan 24, 2024

 

https://twitter.com/TalkWithSally/status/1750290800565449123

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:41 a.m. No.20312062   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2064 >>2068 >>2074 >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

GOP Governors Invoke the Confederate Theory of Secession to Justify Border Violations

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-governors-invoke-confederate-theory-164012921.html

 

This week, Republican governors across the country escalated their conflict with the Biden administration over the southern border by invoking the same legal theory that slave states wielded to justify secession before the Civil War. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, joined by 25 other GOP governors, now argues that the Biden administration has violated the federal government’s “compact” with the states—an abdication that justifies state usurpation of federal authority at the border. This language embraces the Confederacy’s conception of the Constitution as a mere compact that states may exit when they feel it has been broken. It’s dangerous rhetoric that transcends partisan grandstanding. And as before, it’s being used to legitimize both nullification and dehumanization.

 

Consider the very first line of a statement Abbott issued on Wednesday that was subsequently backed by the other Republicans, which states, “The federal government has broken the compact between the United States and the states.” That language is strikingly similar to the very first line of the secession ordinances passed by slave states when they purported to leave the union. Most of these ordinances began with a declaration that the state sought “to dissolve the union” that was “united under the compact” known as the Constitution. It was this “compact”—not national sovereignty, but a contract among states and the federal government—that constituted the United States of America. The secession ordinances asserted that the federal government, and the president especially, owed certain constitutional duties to the states under this contract. It had allegedly abdicated those duties by threatening to restrict slavery and disrespecting the rights of Southern states in other ways inextricably linked to the maintenance of white supremacy. Any state, these ordinances concluded, was therefore entitled to depart the union and become “free and independent” once more.

 

was staunchly opposed this so-called compact theory. As he explained in his first inaugural address, “The Union of these States is perpetual” under the Constitution. The United States do not form a compact, but are a “country” bound together by “national fabric.” This argument provided the entire justification for the war in its early years, which Lincoln initially framed as a battle against secession, not slavery. (“If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it,” he wrote in 1862, “and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it.”) The union that Lincoln hoped to save was an agreement between the sovereign people of the United States, not the states themselves. And so, the president argued, the people of a particular state could not break away of their own volition.

Here, Lincoln drew on an impressive historical pedigree: Sen. Daniel Webster’s rejection of the compact theory during the nullification crisis of 1833. That crisis, too, has uncanny parallels with Abbott’s misunderstanding of federal supremacy today: South Carolina insisted on its right to nullify a tariff enacted by Congress, much like the Texas governor seeks a right to nullify statutes that give Border Patrol authority over the southern border. “No State authority,” Webster proclaimed, “can dissolve the relations subsisting between the government of the United States and individuals.” That relationship was secured by the Constitution, and the states have no prerogative to undermine it, even in the name of supposed injustice or emergency.

 

Webster’s theory prevailed in 1833, and Lincoln’s carried the day in 1865 with the surrender of the Confederacy. Now, however, Abbott appears to disagree with both men. His letter faulted Biden for his “illegal refusal to protect the states” from migrants, failing to “perform his constitutional duties” by detaining every unauthorized migrant. By doing so, Biden purportedly broke the “compact” between the federal government and the states, freeing Texas to supplant federal authority at the border. Or, in Abbott’s words, to exercise its “constitutional authority to defend and protect itself.” (The statement by 25 other GOP governors says almost exactly the same thing.)

p1

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:42 a.m. No.20312064   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

>>20312062

 

For further support, these governors invoked the Constitution’s invasion clause. But this is, at best, a distraction. The invasion clause clarifies that states may not “engage in war” without Congress’ consent “unless actually invaded.” It was intended to let states defend themselves against foreign armies—hence the word war—until the federal government had a chance to respond. James Madison himself said that immigration does not constitute an “invasion,” as the term implied the “operation of war.” No matter how bellicose their rhetoric, Republican governors cannot seriously argue that they are at war with migrants under any constitutional definition of the term. The invasion clause simply does not give states license to usurp federal policy or interfere with federal law enforcement.

 

So the “invasion” language, which Donald Trump repeated on Thursday, is probably best understood as window dressing for the primary legal theory underpinning Republican governors’ claims: that the United States constitutes a compact, and Biden’s violation of this compact triggers a state’s right to supplant federal authority, by force when necessary. It’s difficult to believe that the similarities between this theory and those of the Confederacy are mere coincidence. Either way, the resemblance speaks volumes about Abbott’s dangerous undertaking at the border. The governor vocally despises migrants, almost all of them nonwhite, who are seeking asylum in the United States. At every turn, he depicts them as less than human, violent criminals exploiting the country’s generosity to destroy it from within.

 

What does it look like when secessionist theory is weaponized against a 21st-century president? We have already begun to find out. For months, the Texas National Guard was engaged in an armed standoff with federal law enforcement, as well as active duty service members, at the Rio Grande: Guardsmen used razor wire to fence off the border, preventing federal access to migrants, even those in severe medical distress. On Monday, by a 5–4 vote, the Supreme Court lifted an injunction that prevented federal officers from cutting through this razor wire. But Abbott says his state will “defend and protect itself” by continued use of force, raising the very real possibility of ongoing clashes between state and federal law enforcement. Whether these disputes turn violent is anyone’s guess. The belligerent governor, though, has conspicuously declined to rule out use of force against anyone who stands in his way.

 

Vicious nativism is certainly not a perfect comparison to the totalitarian white supremacy that drove the slave states to Civil War, but it, too, springs from the diseased roots of bigotry, fear, and rage. It should be no surprise, then, that Abbott and his allies would adopt Confederate rhetoric in his quest to seize control over the border and subject migrants to anguish and death. By embracing the Confederate theory of the nation as a mere compact, he has freed himself to take even more aggressive measures against the federal government. We have been here before. It does not end well.

 

2 of 2

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:44 a.m. No.20312075   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2079 >>2083 >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

Thinkerbell 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@Poetonpoetry

Exclusive

The secret they don’t want to know about why we can’t shut the border, ever.

 

Abbott and Biden can’t shut the border or Mexico will shut the power to Texas.

 

I worked as an attorney on deregulation and we told the Leg we didn’t have enough power to deregulate for our need at that point over 20 years ago. So they found a creative way to solve that issue while taking their Enron bribes.

 

Mexico was more than happy to supply Texas power and no one thought it was too big of a security risk, so here we are.

 

Mexico supplies a large part of Texas power and have us by the balls. We can’t say no to Mexico and Mexico is getting rich from us.

 

If they cut the power to Texas, the country goes. I tried to warn them, they called me Chicken Little, uninformed, overreactive.

 

I wish they had been right. But people will do anything to justify their bribes. And they sold the people on choice and you believed it.

 

We are now Mexico’s bitch.

 

Okay, now what do we do?

Build new plants which take at least 20 years to build without constant environmentalist lawsuits that make it massively more expensive and almost impossible to build. Wind and Solar do not come close to working.

Annex the Mexican border where the plants are located which means war.

Impeach Biden and Harris and put Republicans in charge who will at least support efforts to curb the invasion.evne though Mexico will not let them stop it.

Got any other ideas?

#Mexicoborder #TexasBorder #deregulation #TEXASPOWER #TEXASELECTRICITY #BorderInvasion #MexicosBitch

Will Mexico Developments Undercut Authority over ERCOT?

https://tcaptx.com/legislative-watch/blog-will-developments-mexico-undercut-texas-authority-ercot

#ERCOT #TEXASPOWER #TEXASELECTRICITY #ELECTRICITY #GodBlessTexas

5:37 PM · Jan 26, 2024

·

 

https://twitter.com/Poetonpoetry/status/1751026730230296758

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:46 a.m. No.20312079   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

>>20312075

Will Mexico Developments Undercut Authority over ERCOT?

 

ERCOT is an island unto itself — that is, unless the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission takes over.

 

And that at least remote possibility has captured the attention of the state’s top utility regulator. “I’m very, very concerned about it,” said Public Utility Commission chair DeeAnn Walker, addressing her colleagues during a recent PUC meeting.

 

ERCOT, also known as the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, operates the state’s primary power grid. Since its creation decades ago ERCOT has done without most federal oversight and today is overseen primarily by the PUC. But Walker said she has learned of potential developments across the Mexican border that could undermine that arrangement.

 

Here’s the back story:

 

Will FERC take over regulatory authority of ERCOT?

 

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission asserts its jurisdiction over other U.S. power grids because energy flows freely between them. This interstate authority of FERC derives from the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

 

The situation with ERCOT, however, is different. The Texas grid has connections with other states, but those connections are limited by engineering constraints. Texas also maintains links to Mexico, but there’s no possible way that electricity from any other U.S. state could flow into ERCOT through them. As a consequence FERC has maintained it has only very limited authority over the Texas grid. For the most part that job has been left to Texas regulators.

 

But two potential developments in Mexico could change that. Walker said she’s been warned as much by FERC officials.

 

First, a subsidiary of a Dallas-based company wants to create a link between Arizona and Mexico’s main power grid. If this deal goes through, it’s possible that FERC could assert its authority over ERCOT because power — at least theoretically — could flow between Texas and Arizona through this new link.

 

DeAnn Walker

 

Second, officials in Mexico are seeking to link the nation’s main power grid with a separate national grid serving Baja California. This is significant because the Baja California grid imports power from the U.S. state of California. If the two Mexican grids are connected, then California power could flow into ERCOT, and ERCOT, in turn, could fall under FERC control.

 

Although seemingly arcane, these are not trivial issues. ERCOT’s independence from most federal regulatory oversight is prized by stakeholders at ERCOT, as well as industry officials and Texas regulators. ERCOT’s independence “is not only a source of pride, but it makes our market work so well,” Public Utility Commissioner Brandy Marquez said during a recent commission meeting.

 

Walker said she had discussed the situation with officials from AEP Texas, CenterPoint Energy, Oncor and Sharyland.

 

“Those are issues that will occur outside of the United States for which the commission will likely have no notice or participation opportunities,” she said. “Even if they take care of the issues in Arizona, I still have concerns about the impacts in California. We need a solution. This isn’t something we’re going to sit back and wait for it to happen.”

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:53 a.m. No.20312111   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2121 >>2191 >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

Vaccination Rates in The US Could Be Close to a Dangerous Tipping Point

 

https://www.sciencealert.com/vaccination-rates-in-the-us-could-be-close-to-a-dangerous-tipping-point

 

Experts from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US are warning that the country is close to a vaccination tipping point: a point where there aren't enough vaccinated people to protect the unvaccinated, leading to deaths that would otherwise have been prevented.

 

A new commentary, written by FDA Commissioner Robert Califf and FDA vaccine regulator Peter Marks, highlights COVID-19, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus as three diseases where vaccinations are crucial in protecting communities.

 

Measles also gets a mention, with a record number of people no longer getting vaccinated against it. That has meant a number of recent outbreaks, including one in Ohio where 36 children had to be hospitalized because of complications from the measles infection.

 

"An increasing number of people in the US are now declining vaccination for a variety of reasons, ranging from safety concerns to religious beliefs," write the FDA experts.

 

"Population immunity against some vaccine-preventable infectious diseases is at risk, and thousands of excess deaths are likely to occur this season due to illnesses amenable to prevention or reduction in severity of illness with vaccines."

 

Marks and Califf point out just how much work and research goes into developing vaccines that are safe enough to be approved for use, and how that work continues while the vaccine is being distributed and administered, to make sure it stays effective.

 

They also suggest that higher socioeconomic populations are becoming complacent about the need for vaccinations – compared to poorer countries where vaccines simply aren't available, leading to thousands of deaths that could've been prevented.

 

Research shows that COVID-19 vaccinations have helped to prevent tens of millions of deaths, and many more hospitalizations, since the pandemic started. However, social media misinformation means many are opting out of more than just these vaccinations.

 

"Vaccines have been so successful in achieving their intended effects that many people no longer see the disturbing morbidity and mortality from infections amenable to vaccines," continues the commentary.

 

"For example, smallpox has been eradicated, and polio has been eliminated from the US, through effective vaccination campaigns."

 

The commentary calls on clinicians, pharmacists, and all healthcare professionals to continue the work of educating people about the benefits of vaccination, and the hospitalizations and deaths that will occur without it.

 

"We believe that the best way to counter the current large volume of vaccine misinformation is to dilute it with large amounts of truthful, accessible scientific evidence," write the authors of the commentary.

 

"We will do our part at FDA by continuing to provide health care clinicians and the general public with timely and accurate information in plain language to help explain the benefits and risks of vaccination."

 

While we're yet to see any widespread waves of illness caused by a lack of vaccinations, there's no doubt the risk of one is increasing. We don't want to find out what that would look like.

 

Among the associated comments on the published article, retired University of California Davis physician Stuart Stolp commends the authors' efforts while arguing that improved critical thinking skills are the only way to immunize the population from growing misinformation.

 

"To overcome the influence of such enormous volumes of faulty information with even larger volumes of accurate information is comparable to attempting to halt a pandemic by treating infected individuals rather than immunizing a population with an effective vaccine," Stolp says.

 

"The most effective way to counter a literally "infinite" number of mis- and disinformation messages is to preemptively build public health literacy in the population as an essential component of primary and secondary education."

Anonymous ID: 60e1fe Jan. 27, 2024, 6:54 a.m. No.20312122   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3658 >>3682 >>3689

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/86

 

Forensic analysis of the 38 subject deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial

 

Abstract

The analysis reported here is unique in that it is the first study of the original data from the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine clinical trial (CA4591001) to be carried out by a group unaffiliated with the trial sponsor. Our study is a forensic analysis of the 38 trial subjects who died between July 27, 2020, the start of Phase 2/3 of the clinical trial, and March 13, 2021, the data end date of their 6-Month Interim Report. Phase 2/3 of the trial involved 44,060 subjects who were equally distributed into two groups and received Dose 1 of either the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinated or the Placebo control (0.9% normal saline). At Week 20, when the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. FDA, subjects in the placebo arm were given the option to be BNT162b2 vaccinated. All but a few accepted. Surprisingly, a comparison of the number of subject deaths per week during the 33 Weeks of this study found no significant difference between the number of deaths in the vaccinated versus placebo arms for the first 20 weeks of the trial, the placebo-controlled portion of the trial. After Week 20, as subjects in the Placebo were unblinded and vaccinated, deaths among this still unvaccinated cohort of this group slowed and eventually plateaued. Deaths in the BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects continued at the same rate. Our analysis revealed inconsistencies between the subject data listed in the 6-Month Interim Report and publications authored by Pfizer/BioNTech trial site administrators. Most importantly, we found evidence of an over 3.7-fold increase in number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in BNT162b2 vaccinated subjects compared to Placebo controls. This significant adverse event signal was not reported by Pfizer/BioNTech. Potential sources of these data inconsistencies are identified.