>>2031400

Up yours none autistic, logic fail faggot. I see what I see minus your emotional need. The TWO consistent players on this board are a known and open bot and Q. I don't need your approval to notice that. Shadilay to all for recognising consistent play in gameby TWO. I think bot deserves equal scrutiny as Q, you can suit yourself and as for calling me a thread taking up, bot obsessed fag. Why would you unless I was on to something given I have not recognised or thought to mention this until now? I'm a UK autist researching and word fag, more likely to lurk and read than post. BUT GET THIS ANONS you have TWO consistent players on this board and one is Q and one is a bot. Look at the BOT more closely it is not generating random memes, some are hand finished in photoshop and they are often targeted. WWG1WGA be awake to EVERY game play and player on a board.

>>2031679

The benefits of an eidetic memory are having seen the same old shit and remembering it. This post has been sent to others who wanted to draw a parallel to the consistent TWO droppers on Q research. Ie the BOT and Q. The two consistent players on the board. Whether or not anons want to research and dig on this is up to them. They will choose their own path, as for you threat merchant and dick head who repetitively drops crappy cyber threats on anons who lurk, read and dig as logic auts….take a long hard sip from a great big draught of UK fuck you.

>>2031776>>2031880

GTF you are not autistic if you say shit like this. A real autist considers EVERY variable and EVERY player in a game or puzzle. Do you really think a little piss take meme will close down my mind, using child like image as an attempt to ridicule and undermine critical thought is old hat, twat anon….go back to psyche 101 there is no leverage here. The TWO consistent players in the game on THIS board are Q and a bot. Consistents in ANY game are relevant to play. Any decent Aut knows that.

>>2032013

More annoyed that people will not use their critical thinking facility because emotionally bought into the ONE consistent and overlooking the SECOND. But that is their choice.

>>2032035

Overlooking the seemingly weak part on a board is fatality. Every piece that moves consistently ought to be considered as part of the game. That bot is as consistent in the game as Q, everyone ignores it. Why is that the case, don't you wonder? What if Q was the counterpoint to the bot? What is the game?

>>2032084

I'm wondering if Q and the bot are linked to test two different AI programmes on us anons. It wouldn't be that insane to imagine this board was a good place to trial two separate programmes working opposite each other and gather the feedback in terms of anon output and response. Autistic mind always asks who is playing consistently and why. Not so emotional so thinking in terms of what game and who plays and why it exists.