personal experience with social media, red pill post / provocation of insane Democrats – aim to provoke their nastiest tendencies and loudest defenders
***
On my social media account (Todd Munchhouser Beeblbrox Krill, look me up) I recently posted a concise outline of links that to any careful reader would demonstrate the strong argument that Obama and HRC abused all powers to wreck Trump and rig the election.
Someone (a gay liberal open-minded man) asked if it was Democrats and Republicans, just Democrats, etc.
I responded that I think it is just Democrats further stating/suggesting this was high treason and if true should be met with a firing squad.
This person, who was crazy with Trump hate two months ago, calmly accepted my answer only to add, cynically though in a way understandably, that he thinks nobody will be arrested.
To the die-hard extreme left this 'treason so they should die' idea sounds 'out there and violent, absurd, unfounded'
I was immediately attacked by a particularly loud, narcissistic, and hard-headed Democrat with about every cheap tactic and bad argument imaginable.
I was able to respond that high treason, given the condition of being true/actual, could obviously be met with military tribunals and execution and that any other expectation is silly.
This loud Democrat pretty much laid out all elements of the 'blinders on' version of events that a diligent reader of 'MSM extreme filtering and bullshit' would have in their mind.
I am now in a great position to effect the minds of Democrats who are not so irrationally attached to their certainty in the validly of Democrats/ the Dem party.
NONE of these responders, even the monster-post loud guy, bothered to look into any of the arguments for the idea that the previous admin set illegal snares to stop/compromise Trump. They expect me to look into all of their questionable non-sense yet don't even examine the initial post (which sometimes in a single link disposes of their 'responses' to me). Some of them, I presume, were unaware of very basic facts/strong-probabilities, like Obama/HRC associates paying for dossier-plant operations, etc.
I am in a good position, though I am sure many are wondering if I am insane (haha), I can make a literal diagram/map of all the players in this list of links, and mesh that with his cartoon-Russian theories.
By provoking him to lay out the entire thing rather than rely on the platitudes of 'Trump is a nazi', etc., I am now able to capture all the smoke and mirrors in a slow and obvious motion of one giant net.
The idea is NOT that I can prove Obama HRC guilt, but I can introduce all of the public evidence we have which is honestly quite powerful to any subtle thinker.
These people really don't integrate anything incriminating into their logic – smashed phones and bleach bit, multiple FBI and DOJ officials contradicting themselves and one another, Awan server fiasco (which is mind-numbingly obviously bad news for them), etc.
I will let the provocation and responses fester for a while, I am sure at the cost of self-image and sanity to some onlookers.
I took a risk that opens the door to so much argumentative power and reader sympathy.
I honestly don't understand how this 'facebook/instagram red-pilling' will work in a slow-paced, foot by foot upward in altitude sort of way.
To really grab these idiot's ears, it seems 'jabbing them' with some of the more unfriendly ideas works well.
– They look very angry and off-kilter, showing pretty much all signs of 'cerebral narcissism' (used to be in the DSM)
– Their advantage of the other readers being similarly brainwashed by 'Trump = nazi' nonsense is greatly lessened due to his enumerating all the various bits of 'Trump election rigging'
provoke the crazy Democrat to show his ugly narcissistic tendencies (you will initially appear as very wrong to many brain-washed readers, fuck it)
→ deconstruct their nonsense over time, make an outline of 'reality plus predictions', post it, and return to rub things in as the news of the next few months unfolds.
cheers