>>20317309 lb
>>20317313 lb
still jabbering about "QAnon"
What lie and misrepresentations are they telling now?
When will they actually reveal what is done here?
Buzzfeed - thought they were out of business?
New Republic?
If you're a news organ and you have missed the most important stories for years on end; and just do what your owners say?
and what "everybody thinks"
Yes, it hurts when you're discovered to be pushing total fraud and as a result all your pride is shattered; And all your weak stories, in hindsight, are frayed.
The perpetrators of various high crimes have more to worry about than the lying front-line reporters?
>>20316424 lb
can't trust Reuters.
"previously unknown conflict of interest" for the appeal?
Maybe.
But the real appeal will be that DJTrump was gagged - unable to defend himself, as was his lawyer unable to defend him.
Court was biased, Not just because Robbie and Lewis had a previous relationship
Habba mentioned, immediately upon exit from the Courthouse, that the ground for appeal was going to be his first Amendment Right of Free Speech - which is also his right as a defendant to properly defend himself from unjust accusations; but of course they can't report the true grounds for appeal.
They claim DJTrump's defense of himself is a form of harassment. (Same strategy in Georgia and in D.C. Their premise is he is guilty, which is an illegal premise.)
What an inversion, the real defamation was from EuGene.
Right out of Lewis Carroll's "Down the Rabbit Hole" subterranean dream -"reality" farce Court Case in Lewis's 19th c. imaginative fiction, where nothing makes sense, and the defendant is framed (Goes back to European Inquisition style Court frame-ups which Americans attempted to escape)
"Sound of Silence" is totalitarian
cf "Prisoner with out a Name"
Free Speech is antiseptic.
That's why Judge Lewis had to bar it,
The BS news service is putting out baloney; make it seem like a weak "just discovered" ground of appeal is a conflict of interest. No, the ground of appeal is much more primary.
(Wait till they find out Carroll has a dick:
Premise of case - Carroll is a woman who could have a man put something up her; was never proved. Heresay.
Doubt that could be used now, but could be used later in a counter defamation suit.
"Now that would get attention"