Anonymous ID: c095e9 Jan. 28, 2024, 8:46 p.m. No.20321878   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1888

>>20321854

>Race via muh joo "kike, fucking kikes, all kikes should die" etc etc.

>Neither Jim nor Codefaggot Ron ever expressed having any Problems or Concerns with this Fact. In fact, Laughter was the common response.

 

i guess that means that censorship (deletions) are contrary to the spirit of this board

anons can plainly see that it has expanded from deleting "racial slurs"

to wholesale deletions of utterly innocuous material, based on a suspicion of who posted it

it's time for this to stop

it's time for anons to demand jim/cmz do something to make it stop

Anonymous ID: c095e9 Jan. 28, 2024, 8:58 p.m. No.20321907   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1930 >>1940 >>1951

>>20321885

>if this place was compromised that I would be one of the first the clowns would give a permanent ban to

non-sequitur

it does not follow

ps - it's bad grammar to end a sentence or clause with a preposition

your illiteracy is showing

Anonymous ID: c095e9 Jan. 28, 2024, 9:30 p.m. No.20322020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2171

>>20321941

how many coincidences before mathematically impossible?

rather than an undiscovered planet, it is rather more likely to be a brown dwarf companion star to the sun

most stars are binaries, or ternaries

isolated stars are the anomaly, rare actually

the axis of earth's rotation precesses (wobbles) with a period of ~ 25,000 yrs

until recently, that wobble could only be measured against the distant fixed stars

recently, the technology needed to compare the earth's wobble to other bodies in our solar system became available

it was discovered that the entire disk of the solar system is precessing in unison

to cause that would require a truly MASSIVE perturbation

massive like a brown dwarf companion star with an orbital period of ~ 25,000 yrs in a highly eliptical orbit

perihelion could be as close as the inner planets, while aphelion would be in the Oort cloud

every 25,000 years, during it's closest approach, it would drag with it a slew of gravitationally entrained comets

producing a greatly increased risk of comet impacts on the planets

the absence of a cyclic mass extinction events in the fossil record to coincide with this astronomical cycle

suggests impacts are still rare or too small to produce mass extinctions

but a comet impact could cause local devastation, such as an airburst fireball, cratar, or a tsunami

there would also be a risk of damage to the power grid, which wouldn't directly harm animals, but could devastate human populations

Anonymous ID: c095e9 Jan. 28, 2024, 9:42 p.m. No.20322074   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20321969

>happy to live in a country where the masculine gender can still be used in these situations and nobody flips out

aaahhhh…..

the good old days, when the generic masculine pronoun was simply understood to be all inclusive or indeterminate

Anonymous ID: c095e9 Jan. 28, 2024, 9:47 p.m. No.20322095   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20322056

>senescent means you can't get a boner no more

anon is getting older (in his eighth decade)

does not need a blue pill yet

but at some point, one outgrows the thrill of the merry go round

Anonymous ID: c095e9 Jan. 28, 2024, 10:13 p.m. No.20322190   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2213 >>2295

>>20322142

>as if you don't know what the anon are saying

that's the POINT… just because you know what you mean doesn't mean anyone else does

>the constant harping on grammar is a psyop and you know it

far from it….

with 50 yrs experience in higher education, i can say with certainty that sloppy writing is the surest indicator of sloppy thinking

we all make typos and those are mostly ignored

but egregious misspellings and violent assaults on the rules of grammar cast serious doubt on the value of the ideas expressed

if you want to be taken seriously, you should welcome the opportunity to improve

rather than acting like a spoiled petulant deliberately misbehaving child

Anonymous ID: c095e9 Jan. 28, 2024, 10:38 p.m. No.20322281   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2290

>>20322213

>filtered.

no one cares whom you filter so why announce it?

>you're a pointless twit with a superiority complex.

refer to above… irony much?

>you might excel, so you think, at grammar, but you fail at an useful participant in these breads.

>what "useful" participation have you posted? aksing for a fren…..

>you're a name fag and a gadfly and a scold shamer whose mission is merely to waste other people's time.

again, hypocrite much, captain irony?