>>2032516
I think we should revamp notables:
Back in the day 3-7 notables was about average, Bakers did notables this nominate posts stuff wasn't around so much. This made it so slides, duplicates, shit that was days old news didn't get in.
IMO the main reason for notables is to keep a log of data points to track over time and sew together with new information. When we have like 30 notables a bread we have what a few hours worth if data points? We have the last bread and that's it, Autists need more memory than 1 bread that's goldfish territory. Notables used to last about a day, it just scrolls too fast.
Possible Solution: We have BO create a notables thread, set it up as a scrolling thread (what BO did with Question was badass). Theorhetically it will give us up to 700 breads worth of data memory. If everyone wants to include so much in notables at least this way we could refer back to them when our Autism kicks in and we see a pattern. A problem may be trolls, but it could be pruned if that became a problem.
Just my 2 cents I think we are all doing incredibly great work.