>>>2032203
Thanks so much for openly joining me in the thinking about this, very interesting phenomena here and difficult to punt broader thoughts beyond Q. The wide picture is fucking fascinating
If I wanted to test my AI programme and see what the most hard core researching core of the internet would do when offered some semi proofs and opportunity to prove for themselves, where would I take that? And what if I dropped a second AI bot in that ran on an up take and learn algorithm in order to see whether it would be ignored or investigated. What makes every autistic anon here so absolutely positive that they are not part of an excellently well executed AI experiment? I am autistic and I have LOGICAL reason to consider this entire thing an experiment in AI and dissemination of underground news. That might sound shilly or disappointing, but critical thinking requires that EVERY possibility is considered when engaged in an 'unknown game' with 'unknown parameters' and 'unknown game makers' A great deal of emotional and political investment is going into a total UNKNOWN here.
What would happen if every single anon on here stopped digging and stopped sharing and stood back and said Q proof without doubt or fuck off? Bring the board to a standstill and demand clear cut, incontrovertible proof via no anon activity AT ALL. End the charade, end the game, unequivocal proof or fuck off. Everyone sits still and does nothing until it comes through. That would make or break the proof.