Donald Trump Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize Again

Ewan PalmerJan 30, 2024 at 8:00

Donald Trump has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize after his name was put forward by a Republican congresswoman, citing the Abraham Accords the former president helped sign while in office.

New York Rep. Claudia Tenney said that Trump was "instrumental" in brokering the treatysigned in September 2020 between Israel and Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates, which aimed to normalize their relations as part of an overall goal to tackle ongoing tensions in the Middle East between Arab countries and Israel. Morocco and Sudan followed suit in signing similar agreements in the following months.

"For decades, bureaucrats, foreign policy 'professionals', and international organizations insisted that additional Middle East peace agreements were impossible without a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. President Trump proved that to be false," Tenney told Fox News in a statement.

Tenney noted that the 1976 Israeli peace agreement with Egypt and the Oslo Accords in 1994 were both recognized with Nobel Peace Prizes, but so far Trump's role in the signing of the Abraham Accords had not been acknowledged.

While the Abraham Accords have been cited as a way to introduce and strengthen Israeli-Arab ties, the historic agreements have also been criticized for so far failing to produce meaningful solutions for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"The valiant efforts by President Trump in creating the Abraham Accords were unprecedented and continue to go unrecognized by the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, underscoring the need for his nomination today," Tenney added.

"Now more than ever, when Joe Biden's weak leadership on the international stage is threatening our country's safety and security, we must recognize Trump for his strong leadership and his efforts to achieve world peace."

Trump's office has been contacted for comment via email.

Trump has been nominated for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize three times in the past.

In September 2020, Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a member of the Norwegian parliament, nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his "groundbreaking cooperation" in helping signing the Abraham Accords.

One month later, Laura Huhtasaari, a Finnish member of the European Parliament (MEP) and a member of the right-wing Finns Party, also nominated Trump for the 2021 prize "in recognition of his endeavors to end the era of endless wars, construct peace by encouraging conflicting parties for dialogue and negotiations, as well as underpin internal cohesion and stability of his country."

Trump received a third nomination from a group of Australian lawmakers in September 2020 for his promotion of peace in the Middle-East.

"What he has done with the Trump Doctrine is that he has decided he would no longer have America in endless wars, wars which achieve nothing but the killing of thousands of young Americans," Eminent law professor David Flint told Sky News Australia at the time.

"So he's reducing America's tendency to get involved in any and every war."

Thousands of people are eligible to nominate candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize, including members of governments, university professors and past laureates. The committee decides from hundreds of nominees and the winner of this year's prize will be announced in October.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-nominated-nobel-peace-prize-abraham-accords-1865242

Bill Pushing Digital IDs Advances in Florida

Frank BergmanJanuary 29, 2024 -

A bill that paves the way for mandatory digital IDs is advancing in Florida’s state legislature.

The legislation seeks to ban children under 16 years old from using social media.

On the surface, the bill states that it is aimed at protecting the privacy and well-being of minors by restricting social media to those aged 16 and over.

The bill mandates rigorous age verification and calls for existing accounts of underage users to be deleted while purging any stored personal information.

However, while the bill appears to be in the interest of protecting children,it also mandates that anyone who is 16 or older must prove their age to be able to use social media.

As such, adults would need to have a “digital ID” if they wish to continue logging into their social media accounts.

The legislation calls for age verification through an independent, third-party digital ID that is unrelated to the social media platform.

A bipartisan majority in the Florida House has ratified the bill with a vote of 106-13.

It now awaits receipt by the Republican-majority Senate.

Drawn up to address platforms with potential “addictive, harmful, or deceptive design features,” this legislation is aimed at deterring persistent or compulsive usage influenced by digital design.

Republican state lawmaker and bill co-sponsor Fiona McFarland equated social media usage designed to trigger dopamine releases to a “digital fentanyl.”

Florida’s move comes against the backdrop of growing concern over the impact of social media on kids’ mental health and well-being.

Last year, Democrat President Joe Biden’s Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued a warning on the potential harms of social media for children and adolescents.

Murthy has been calling for more research into the area.

The implementation of online age verification systems is increasingly demanding the requirement for the digital IDs rollout.

It has sparked a significant debate about the balance between internet safety and free speech.

These systems are designed to verify the age of users, ostensibly to protect younger audiences from inappropriate content or to ensure compliance with legal age restrictions.

However, they often necessitate the use of digital IDs, which can include personal information like name, age, and sometimes even location.

This shift towards digital IDs for age verification purposes raises concerns about the erosion of online anonymity and the ability to speak under a pseudonym.

https://slaynews.com/news/bill-pushing-digital-id-advances-florida/

Floridians better protest on this DS bill to get everyones identity to track them and whatever else they want to do

Two Jan. 6 'convicts' get out of jail as Supremes consider feds' schemes

Bob Unruh. Jan. 28, 2024

The prosecution of those people who rioted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 is, by now, completely political. There’s little argument those who did vandalism should be prosecuted, but there have been people convicted for offenses related to that day who didn’t go into the building, and weren’t even in Washington at the time.

One of the key charges presented by leftist prosecutors to leftist judges in the district has been “obstructing.”

And now the Supreme Court has begun a review of whether that was appropriate, and as a result, two “convicts” from that day have been released from jail, according to a report in the Washington Times.

The Times confirmed at least two of those defendants “got out from behind bars because theSupreme Court is reviewing the legitimacy of charging them with obstructing an official proceeding, which is one of the feds’ favorite charges for people who breached the Capitol.”

The charge, however, has been used irregularly, as Rep. Jamal Bowman, a Democrat who could be argued to have “obstructed” Congress by inappropriately setting of a fire alarm during a vote, never was charged with that offense.

The report explained Jan. 6 defendant Joseph Fischer charged prosecutors were being overly broad in their interpretation of the law, which cites “obstructing an official proceeding.”

Will any government personnel ever go to prison for framing the Jan. 6 protesters?He accuses prosecutors of launching “hundreds” of cases based on their incorrect definition, including against President Donald Trump.

The ruling could have a wide-ranging impact on the entire prosecutorial ideology being used in Washington now, and the report said until that decision comes down, “at least two defendants successfully petitioned for early release pending the decision.”

More are expected to file similar documents, and a few more already have.The report explained prosecutors have used the charge more than 300 times, of the some 1,000 cases stemming from that day.

”At least 152 people were convicted or pleaded guilty to obstructing an official proceeding and more than 100 have been sentenced,” the report said,.

Released already was Thomas Adams Jr., convicted of obstructing an official proceedingand sentenced to 14 months behind bars,after the judge concluded the high court could side with Fischer.

Government lawyers argued against his release, claiming his “offenses” were “of the utmost seriousness.”

Among his infractions, they charge, was that he recorded on his cellphone for several minutes before being removed by police.

The other defendant is Alexander Sheppard, who successfully petitioned for early release because of the Supreme Court’s pending decision.

There,Judge John D. Bates said, “The Court agrees with Sheppard’s contention that the Supreme Court’s grant of the cert petition raises a ‘substantial question’ as to the validity of his … conviction.”

The report said, “The Fischer case underscores how broadly the government applied the charge to demonstrators who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6. Mr. Fischer, a former police officer in Pennsylvania, attended President Trump’s ‘Stop the Steal’ rally near the White House on Jan. 6, 2021. He did not immediately join the demonstration-turned-riot at the Capitol or enter the Capitol building.

”He and a companion left town briefly but later returned to the Capitol grounds and entered the building, though after the electoral vote count in Congress had been suspended. Mr.Fischer was inside the Capitol for about four minutes, according to court records.”

https://www.wnd.com/2024/01/two-jan-6-convicts-get-jail-supremes-consider-feds-schemes/

True Justice is Coming

A pandemic mea culpa from Francis Collins

Opinion by Jeff Jacoby

• 1w.1/2

It comes three years too late. But Francis Collins, the former head of the National Institutes of Health, has finally admitted that the COVID-19 lockdowns caused a massive amount of harm — harm to which he and other government public-health experts, such as Anthony Fauci of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, were oblivious because they were obsessed with doing things their way.

The Mea Culpa came last summer during a conversation hosted by Braver Angels, an organization that promotes dialogue among Americans with sharply different ideologies and political loyalties. Collins, who as NIH director played a central role in shaping Washington’s response to COVID-19, was paired with Wilk Wilkinson, a Minnesota trucking manager and podcast host who strongly opposed how government officials addressed the pandemic. The 90-minute exchange, moderated by Boston College professor Martha Bayles, was recorded six months ago but only recently attracted attention when excerpts were posted on social media.

The whole conversation was interesting, but one segment in particular was jaw-dropping. Collins described with remarkable candor just how narrow-minded, how willfully myopic, he and other high-level public health officials had been as they dealt with the crisis.

As a guy living inside the beltway, feeling the sense of crisis, trying to decide what to do in some situation room in the White House with people who had data that was incomplete, we weren’t really thinking about what that would mean to Wilk and his family in Minnesota a thousand miles away from where the virus was hitting so hard,” confessed Collins, who retired from the NIH at the end of 2021. “We weren’t really considering the consequences in communities that were not New York City or some other big city.”

That was a stunning admission. What he said next was even more scandalous.

“If you’re a public health person and you’re trying to make a decision, you have this very narrow view of what the right decision is, and that is something that will save a life. Doesn’t matter what else happens. So you attach infinite value to stopping the disease and saving a life. You attach zero value to whether this actually totally disrupts people’s lives, ruins the economy, and has many kids kept out of school in a way that they never recover from.”

“Collateral damage,” said Wilkinson.

“Collateral damage,” Collins agreed. He and his colleagues were locked in what he now concedes was the “public health mindset” — a monomaniacal approach that blinded them to the injuries they were causing. “A lot of us had that mindset, and that was really unfortunate.”

Was it ever.

As early as March 2020, Fauci recommended a nationwide lockdown and called for a “dramatic diminution of the personal interaction” in daily activities. He warned that “life is not going to be the way it used to be in the United States,” while insisting that was “best for the American public.” Collins said at the time that the only correct approach was “one that most people would find to be too drastic because otherwise it is not drastic enough.”

Now, of course, it is far too late to mitigate any of the pain endured by millions of Americans hurt by the government’s high-handed edicts and recommendations. Those curbs and controls began with the declaration of a federal emergency and travel ban, which in turn spurred many states to order their own restrictions.

The coast-to-coast lockdown destroyed tens of millions of jobs and at least 200,000 small businesses. It exacerbated numerous social ills, worsened mental illness, and took a deadly toll in missed cancer diagnoses and untreated heart disease. The prolonged school closures inflicted unprecedented damage on children. The social distancing and mask mandates were enforced with a ruthlessness that at times turned despotic. And countless men and women — from ordinary citizens to noted epidemiologists to elected state officials — found themselves demonized, censored, or shunned for challenging those who attached “zero value” to their concerns.

All this damage was caused not by the pandemic but by politicians who abdicated their judgment and left it to public-health experts. Whether out of panic, pigheadedness, or perversity, they declined to balance costs against benefits, a basic function of policymaking. Instead, they insisted they would “follow the science” — as though scientists were endowed with an infallible road map to navigate COVID’s complex interplay of disease, economics, education, psychology, and politics in a nation of 330 million people….

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-pandemic-mea-culpa-from-francis-collins/ar-BB1h18DK

>>20331966

2/2

The great economist and social historian Thomas Sowell has often observed that “there are no solutions, there are only tradeoffs.” That is a fundamental reality in all policymaking. There are pros and cons to everything government does. For officials responding to the pandemic,there can hardly have been a more shocking intellectual failure than the one to which Collins now confesses: attaching “infinite value” to stopping the disease and no value at all to everything else.

The same sort of thinking can be a pitfall in many other areas. Focus on reducing fossil fuel use at any price, for example, and the results will be stunted economic growth and continued misery for many of the world’s poorest people. Assign maximum importance to achieving racial diversity in student admissions and the result is affirmative action preferences so lopsided that they violate the Constitution. Allow the prevention of another 9/11 to override every other consideration, and the CIA ends up torturing prisoners in secret “black sites” beyond the reach of law.

From crime to homelessness to addiction to national defense, there are always costs to be weighed against benefits. And if acknowledging tradeoffs is indispensable to the work of government, it is especially so at times of crisis.

Toward the end of the Braver Angels conversation,Collins acknowledged another way in which he and many of his inside-the-Beltway colleagues blundered.

It was folly, he said, to think that Washington knew what was best for the whole nation. “The fact that we could put blanket recommendations across this incredible wide, broad, and diverse country and expect them to be right . . . obviously could not have been correct. And yet that’s what was done.”

COVID-19 would have been a terrible destroyer in any case. But it was made all the more catastrophic by the failure of politicians and experts who not only were sure they knew best but were unwilling even to consider other views. Americans’ respect for public-health experts took a beating during the pandemic, and it is a black mark on Collins’s legacy that he was so complacent about the harm the government’s policies caused. For belatedly admitting where he went wrong, he certainly deserves credit. Let him continue to speak out, to warn other scientists against falling into the same trap, and he’ll deserve a lot more.

(Collins is lying through this whole conversation. He and they all should go to prison in Gitmo. And have a TV Trial and punishment, for everyone that died at their hands and all lives and families destroyed. The destruction can never be equated in financial ways, it destroyed society and humanity.For that they should die!But not before our country and people get the Billions of dollars they made on this genocide.)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-pandemic-mea-culpa-from-francis-collins/ar-BB1h18DK

The Fani Willis Affair: Will Fulton County’s RICO Case Against Trump Die a Death of 1,000 Cuts?

Philip Holloway. Jan. 26, 2024

1/2

The legal and political worlds were rocked this month when Michael Roman, a former Trump opposition researcher and co-defendant in the massive RICO case brought against Roman, Trump and others by Fulton County GA District Attorney, Fani Willis, filed a bombshell motion to dismiss the indictment. Through his lawyer, Ashleigh Merchant, Roman alleges that DA Willis and her “Special Prosecutor” Nathan Wade have been having a:

“clandestine personal relationship during the pendency of this case, which has resulted in the special prosecutor, and, in turn, the district attorney, profiting significantly from this prosecution at the expense of the taxpayers.”

“Willis and Wade have traveled personally together to such places as Napa Valley, California, Florida and the Caribbean and Wade has purchased tickets for both of them to travel on both the Norwegian and Royal Caribbean cruise lines. Wade has also purchased hotel rooms for personal trips with funds from the same account used to receive payments under his contract with Willis.”

Nathan Wade is a private lawyer who was awarded a peculiar but lucrative no-bid contract to serve as “Special Prosecutor” in the case. The DA already has a large stable of experienced felony prosecutors who work full time as Assistant District Attorneys. It’s a mystery why Willis needs to hire an outside criminal defense lawyer to prosecute Donald Trump. Roman notes that Wade is woefully underqualified for such a massive undertaking as prosecuting a sprawling RICO case involving a former president.

“Based on her longstanding personal knowledge of Wade and additional research, undersigned counsel is unaware of, and is unable to find any history of,Wade ever having prosecuted a single felony trial, much less at the rate Willis is paying him. Based on his current experience, and based on the current appointment guidelines, Mr. Wade wouldnot be qualified to serve as defense counsel in this RICO case because he has not tried “at least two criminal trials of similar offenses.”

In short, Roman claims Willis is steering massive sums of taxpayer money to her married lover and in turn receiving a financial benefit, a kickback, from her lover in the form of luxury travel. Roman suggests that Willis and Wade might haveviolated federal law through this alleged kickback scheme in the form of “Honest Services Fraud” and, ironically a RICO violation.

This filing set off a firestorm that is enveloping the DA’s team. Since Roman’s filing, we have seen proof that Wade met with Biden’s White House counsel in the lead up to the indictment and that he coordinated with the January 6 commission. We have learned that days before confirming the existence of the Trump probe to GA Governor Kemp,Willis spent large sums of taxpayer money to hire a media monitoring firm to track her media exposure.

We’ve also learned a judge booted Willis from investigating GA Lt. Governor Burt Jones as a potential co-defendant in the Trump case because of a conflict of interest after she hosted a fundraiser for Jones’ election opponent…

https://townhall.com/columnists/philipholloway/2024/01/26/the-fani-willis-affair-will-fulton-countys-rico-case-against-trump-die-a-death-of-1000-cuts-n2634243

Anons please meme this photo, pockmarks and scars or a pirate, or whatever

>>20332011

2/2

When Willis tried this week to weasel out of having to testify in her alleged lover's pending-divorce case, we learned from the wife’s lawyer through court filings that she has receipts: credit card statements show Wade paid for travel and purchased tickets in Willis’ name for their personal alleged romantic getaways.

And we have now also learned that Willis did not disclose any gifts from Wade on her annual Income and Financial Disclosure for 2022, which required her todisclosure any gift or favor above $100 from a “prohibited source,” defined as anyone “doing business with the county” or seeking to do business with the county. If Willis accepted personal gifts – from a lover – who is doing business with the county that would be bad enough but if she fails to disclose such on the required form – the form designed to root out kickback schemes – thenshe may have bigger problems headedher way beyond whatever may happen with the Trump RICO case.

How do we get from an alleged affair to a possible dismissal of the case?

For starters, if these allegations are true, and Willis has not denied them as of this writing, Willis has a financial interest in the very existence of and in the continuation of the case by virtue of the taxpayer funds finding their way back to her in the form of plane tickets and travel. Roman’s motion claims: “Wade has also purchased hotel rooms for personal trips with funds from thesame account used to receive payments under his contract with Willis.” Some might call this a kickback. Regardless, it shows that Willis has no business anywhere near this case because she has an irreconcilable conflict of interest.

But it’s more than kickbacks and conflicts of interest. When you put it all together, we see a case that isstructurally unsound and that violates the due process rights of the defendants.

Due process boils down to “fundamental fairness” and that means prosecutors are expected to carry out their duties in a fundamentally fair way. Prosecutors are required to be objective and wield their awesome power without bias and certainly not to use the criminal justice system as a political weapon. If there is the appearance that she’s using the criminal process to enhance her personal media profile or for personal political advancement, or for personal economic gain, we could be witnessing a real-time derailment of this indictment.

If Willis pursued this case with such un-pure motives that this case was not brought and maintained in the spirit of fundamental fairness, then it should be dismissed, and the rest of the chips can fall where they may.

The judge might simply recuse Willis, and by extension every lawyer working for her. Her recusal would be appropriate, but recusal is not enough. Assuming a replacement prosecutor willing to take the case could even be found, and the case was tainted from the start due to a financial conflict of interest, recusal will not cure that taint. The only way to cure the conflict of interest and due process violation created by this case being brought for political and personal gain is a complete dismissal.

(GA Congress has already deemed 22 rules or laws she’s broken, she should be put in the jail she sends all the blacks to in Fulton County.)

https://townhall.com/columnists/philipholloway/2024/01/26/the-fani-willis-affair-will-fulton-countys-rico-case-against-trump-die-a-death-of-1000-cuts-n2634243

Sabin Howard Calls On All Patriots To Come Out To WW1 Sculpture Unveiling In Washington D.C. On Sept. 13He spent 8 years of working and getting the commission.Must listen its amazing36’ bronze wall with a team of 360 people on the team. I real life size. Impressive!

12:13

https://rumble.com/embed/v4730e0/?pub=4

Sabin Howard is a classical figurative sculptor based in New York City,[2] with a studio in Englewood, New Jersey.[3] He is a board member of the National Sculpture Society. His work has been shown at numerous solo and group shows. He is the sculptor for a project entitled "The Weight of Sacrifice" that is one of five finalists for the World War I Memorial in Pershing Park, Washington D.C[4][5][6][7] His notable works include the recent National WWI Memorial sculpture.[8][9] Howard is the creator of the large-scale pieces Hermes, Aphrodite, and Apollo, as well as many smaller pieces.[10][11] His works are owned by private collectors and museums including The Mount, Edith Wharton's home.[12][13]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabin_Howard

>>20332093

This is his goal: “Make Art Great Again”. Sabin Howardjust explained the entire time and his artistic gifts to complete this sculpture. Really an amazing story. 8 years to creat this work of art, with 360 working with him