Anonymous ID: 3c13f2 Jan. 31, 2024, 1:07 p.m. No.20336724   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The three letter agencies of America have decided that so-called “far-right terrorism” is a much bigger problem than any other terrorist threats outside of American soil, with the Department of Defense holding staff event meeting event to discuss the issue.

For context, the Defense Department defines terrorism as the “unlawful use of violence or threat of violence to instill fear and coerce governments and societies.”

So, instead of worrying about the millions of unchecked illegal immigrants pouring across the Southern border, the U.S. government has focused on what they term “homegrown” terrorism. In other words, any American who supports ‘Making America Great Again’ and the re-election of Donald Trump is a “terrorist.”

They launch a new “brown bag events” series featuring both internal and guest speakers on the threat of “far-right terrorism.”

Among those invited by the Pentagon were Bruce Hoffman, a professor at Georgetown University and senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, and Jacob Ware, a research fellow at the CFR, the Daily Caller reported.

Hoffman and Ware have one thing in common: they have a new book out titled, “God, Guns, and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America.”

The Pentagon invitation read as follows:

“Reminder to please join us at 1200 tomorrow morning via Teams (link below) for this virtual brown bag book talk event — renowned terrorism scholars Dr. Bruce Hoffman and Jacob Ware.”

“This is the first of what we hope will be a series of brown bag events featuring internal and external speakers,” it continued.

“This talk, derived from the speakers’ new book, God, Guns, and Sedition (Columbia Univ. Press), discusses the rise of far-right terrorism in the United States, the impact of U.S. domestic terrorism on our foreign policy and our allies, and policy recommendations to counter far-right terrorism.”

 

https://disswire.com/dod-holds-staff-event-on-rise-of-far-right-terrorism-in-u-s/

Anonymous ID: 3c13f2 Jan. 31, 2024, 1:10 p.m. No.20336735   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6890

Australia’s Department of Child Protection (DCP) must pay compensation and medical expenses to a youth worker who developed pericarditis after getting a Covid booster under a workplace vaccination directive, the South Australian Employment Tribunal has ruled.

In a decision handed down on January 15th 2024, the tribunal determined that Daniel Shepherd’s employment was “a significant contributing cause” to his injury, which has since rendered him incapable of performing his role at work.

Shepherd got a Covid booster in February 2022 as a requirement for his ongoing employment with the DCP. The DCP admitted that Shepherd’s pericarditis had been caused by the booster, but denied responsibility for the injury, arguing that it did not arise from Shepherd’s employment, but from a lawful State Government Public Health Order (PHO), issued under the Emergency Management Act 2004 (EMA).

However, the tribunal rejected the DCP’s argument, deciding that because the injury arose as a result of both the state-directed vaccination mandate and his employment, Mr. Shepherd was entitled to workers compensation.

“This is a good decision” says human rights lawyer Peter Fam of Sydney law firm Maat’s Method, noting that it sets an important precedent for holding employers accountable for injuries incurred as a result of vaccination directives enforced in the workplace.

“The most significant aspect of this case, in my opinion, is that even though there was a Public Health Order in place, the tribunal found the employer responsible anyway,” says Fam.

Many Australian employers have sought to deflect responsibility for injuries incurred under workplace Covid vaccine directives on the basis that they were simply following state Government orders.

However, under workers compensation law, the workplace is liable if employment is “a significant contributing cause of the injury”, regardless of whether other factors also contributed, explains Fam.

 

https://dailysceptic.org/2024/01/31/employer-liable-for-vaccine-injury-acquired-due-to-vaccine-mandate-court-rules/