My take is It’s cat talk not English. I can haz cheeseburger?
Which were some of the penultimate memes in the history of memes.
Also pigs message is always on point so I find it hard to believe it’s harming anons in any way. I can’t find any subliminal, anti trump, anti q of anti America, anti mission, ant-wwg1wga, etc. even though his detractors insist there must be. Buried somewhere. We can’t see. And reee about it.
Based on all those observable and measurable data points, I would present the theory that anti- pigs abhor the message in a TDS manner, as well as want to break a possibly effective meme maker through argumentum ad hominem.
Agreed anons are faceless, nameless and faceless, for many reasons but one reason is because that gives the shills no targets to focus on. Pig is recognizable and gives shills a target.
Anons just bleep past what they don’t want to see. They have developed their freedom muscles by now. The reee-ers then, by this elimination, and by their incendiary ad hominems without sauce, are logically as much against the messages as they are against the Memer. But this memer has a hard shell. Almost armor if you will I don’t think any shills will break pig- not with anything as weakly formulated as ad hominem
If you do want the board to support any claims, or agree with you, let alone reach consensus, you must sauce yiur claims.
Make a graphic of anti- q pig memes and state your case.
Ad hominem is for the weak, fedcoats, and shills.