Anonymous ID: 357729 July 4, 2018, 5:44 p.m. No.2034767   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2034720

you've been baited by leftypol/act.il/unti8200/democrat university farms/etc.

The shills tried many different waves of narratives which stretched to all sorts of things, one of them being soemthing about a stock photo

what ended up coming from it was Q mentioned how trolling them is fun and that they thought they could get away with working around nat sec laws wherein they used a reflection off of a phone which showed an image of something (likely used to authenticate on their end), but the picture was intercepted by our guys and Q decided to taunt them with the picture

he sort of dangled it in front of them. it was a jab. it was sort of in the line with the proof he's been doing, but this one was a little special, hence anons and the newfags/shills getting all caught up on the image.

Q realized everyone was getting thrown off a little, hence his "trolling is fun" post

Anonymous ID: 357729 July 4, 2018, 5:58 p.m. No.2034969   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5125 >>5136

>>2034882

this doesn't seem like a missing notables issue

although the motto has been removed

Vincit Omnia Veritas

however, I do have to say that I wasn't here to see the thread it was in and then the next thread where it wasn't which supposedly the namefag created

 

But, either way, we all shouldn't be wasting this much time and energy discussing who the baker should be. When previous discussion had come up about issues with the current baker, it was never really over whether or not someone was namefagging or not, so this seems more like a anon culture surfacing type of issue, not so much a qresearch board type of issue

 

At the end of it all, if this much aspergers is being triggered by one baker, it's likely best that for the good of the investigation, we consider disallowing people that insist upon namefaging to be baker in the future. I also just want to note that I was in favor of this guy baking previouslyโ€ฆ Man, I know I'm feeling a like a pedant at this point, but it just seems like it shouldn't be this much of an issue.

Anonymous ID: 357729 July 4, 2018, 6:13 p.m. No.2035137   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5163 >>5185 >>5204

>>2035089

>>2035117

hey fuckers, quit feeding them

if you read the breads from last night, you'll find that the picture was important because Q was taunting people that took it. the photo was taken on AF1 when BHO was in office, as was concluded last night. they thought they could circumvent laws that grant clearance. this has been explained in detail more than once