dChan
Anonymous ID: d5f7c9 July 4, 2018, 5:41 p.m. No.2034728   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4820

why is

VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS

MISSING?

I saw possibly the only reasonable use of a (you) in notables earlier

>>2031705 (You) Please put Semper Fidelis back into the bread

 

I agree with adding Semper Fi to the bread in light of the 4th

but will someone please give a rational reason for

removing the THE TRUTH ALWAYS WINS ??

VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS

 

WHY is that often removed?

I feel that is the motto of /qresearch/

That the truth wins

That the nearly overwhelming flood of shitposts and misinformation will drown out the truth

That is what (((they))) want after all… to give us the mushroom treatment… 'keep 'em in the dark & feed 'em bullshit'

 

This is a little thing I know, but it's also not so little

every post here is read

it all has a subliminal effect

group moral and general direction of threads can be influenced by bread title and header posts

I love

“The truth is like a lion; you don’t have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself.” ~ Augustine of Hippo

 

For that is what we do here

we find the fine pearls of truth hidden in the oceans of shitposts here and we show them to the world to spread them.

Anonymous ID: d5f7c9 July 4, 2018, 6:05 p.m. No.2035044   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5167 >>5374

>>2034972

nice comeback you lame shill

 

I've baked a shitload and never namefagged

I post regulally and don't namefag

When I want I can post and namefag and everyone knows who it is and respects it

 

you can't say the same can you

anon can say it, but it won't be truth

Anonymous ID: d5f7c9 July 4, 2018, 6:13 p.m. No.2035136   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2034969

the issue of namefagging is partially what this is all about

 

the ego driven BS gotta go

the bread is baked by anonymous or baker any other text in the name field is not right.. it is a culture thing but in the case of chan culture there is usualy a very long and logical reason for it. I don't mean rationalization for it I mean logical reason for it. Human nature is well known, it's also complicated.

 

my main gripe with the whole thing is the subtle subversive shit that keeps showing up that and the true notables that don't make it into the list for a few breads if at all…

Anonymous ID: d5f7c9 July 4, 2018, 6:19 p.m. No.2035201   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5245 >>5251

BO

it's been over 24hrs and you haven't answered

I guess I'll bring it up in the general.

There is a solution to the baker problem that doesn't involve namefagging or TCs

 

I've pointed it out twice, once this morning in the general and yesterday AM in meta.

I think it is a workable toward transparency.

an anon who wants to bake will build a track record of bakes so we can choose which baker gets to bake when there is more than one stepping up.

Anonymous ID: d5f7c9 July 4, 2018, 6:34 p.m. No.2035346   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5371

>>2035251

no it isn't

 

here's an example

the bakers don't post dough in a practice bake but you'll get the drift

 

transparency

plus it allows anons to help keep track of baker quality