Anonymous ID: 06a271 Feb. 2, 2024, 11:49 a.m. No.20346729   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6747 >>6767

>>20346665

Yeah, it was some question like, "Show me Q said all Anons had to" or some shit, just a total straw man made up bullshit argument. Not reductio ad absurdum, but something different, not sure of the term to describe the type of nonsense he tried using.

 

That clown loves to crow that he's rent free in my head, but hasn't been able to stop talking about me for over six months now and claims he BTFO'd me today with a question, which is rich considering he's deflected from any question I've asked for half a year now and then prances around claiming that he's destroyed me. His whining about recognizing individuality here is what makes me laugh the most.

Anonymous ID: 06a271 Feb. 2, 2024, 12:02 p.m. No.20346780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6825

>>20346747

I'm humoring your question, even though you're namefagging right now. Follow the logic of that question through: If bakers are allowed to be individuals and have personalized banners, then so are Anons, and any whining or crusading against that fact, by someone known to bake, makes a wonderful spotlight on his argument that he's trying to force upon others with persecuted malice.