Pride is actually considered sinful, anon.
allowed by who?
just giving an alternative point of view.
that's what this place does: it deconstructs others assumptions and shows how often times what they present as 'awesome' maybe needs some work.
I think you have a pretty good handle on when pride is sinful and when it's admiration of others and more like a love of what they have done, of them for doing it and respect.
>>20346506
why don't you say it like this
"They say that if you are . . . "
it makes it sound like you are calling people out for hatred, which seems judgemental.
much of the time in the media when people are called 'antisemitic' it's actually a kind of slander.
PS: the recreational center is the ONLY ONE of it's kind in the Commonwealth.
her action exposes pandering by the commonwealth to a community run by cry-baby activasts.
>>20346556
Even as I post to you, which I wouldn't have if I'd looked at the name field, your posts are deleted.
no, jerky-name-fag-troll
Q is not what you say.
nor are anon.
anon might be tweekers and will poke at your assumptions, but they are not haters as you say.
the constant accusation of that which you suggest is a constant kind of grievous slander and actually has the effect of increasing the very feelings which you pretend to want to eliminate.
he gets deleted even as he posts . . .
why does he bother?
imagine being such a hateful troll?
as far as that family he mentions: if they did all the stuff that they have bragged about doing, like the day of Waterloo, they ought to pay reparations and dress in sack cloth and atone and take a vow of poverty for a while.
that was over 200 years ago.
for all I know they've already dealth with the guilt of having relatives who are so deceptive . . .
but he, he's just a troll instigator.
He never even posts news links or helps with people's questions.
I don't really mind that there is a recreation center in Roxbury. What bothers me is the ones with the signs saying 'why not Wellesley'.
I mean it's the Wellesley towns that pay all the taxes, with their high incomes.
and PS: the only DOR place in Wellesley is that river spot that used to be a Seminary, and it's not got any place to bunk down.
There's an old abandoned mansion there, is about all.
Healy acts like a dictator. She doesn't even behave like a Massachusetts politican ought to behave.
the legacy of Curley is totally forgotten: you might be a cleptocrat, but you share the wealth with the people.
People always talked about how Curley would feed the poor during the 30s when the Beacon Hill wealthy were living the high life and didn't really share that much.
How did we get here?
When the legislature said 20 years ago 'dreamers get free everything' I thought 'huh, the marxists really have taken over. They are bringing in their families from overseas to give them free everything.'
I don't even link to him. He finds my post and puts up a slanderous meme.
Johnathon does stuff that I don't approve of but I'm sure he never said something like what the meme says.
I don't like his methods and I think he's paranoid but I forgive him for being that way and wish he could reform.
but what the slander shill does is defame everyone and try to slander the whole board.
Johnathon if you are listening I don't approve of censorship, but I also find it odious and loathsome that the one who gets deleted here posts that slanderous stuff about you.
escaped the command line?
why aren't you running it on a virtual host?
run it in a sandbox in a sandbox and then when it 'breaks the sand box' it won't know that it's still in a sand box.
huh, Jim, you sure got some weird projects going on.
Every led node which has four LEDs on a strand of lights has it's OWN microprocessor. When I thought about it I asked my self why would they make something so complex?
and the answers I got in my head made me think 'huh, doesn't that seem to be a possible place to host stuff that the user wouldn't know about'.
so I don't use the light strands any more.
I haven't heard anyone use the catch phrase to reply to this prosecutor . . .
"What chu talkin' about, Willis"
I guess it would have to be a Black person that would need to say that.
not race baiting, anon.
Here name is Willis.
It's a common phrase.
Did I not say it would 'have to be . . '
because I knew someone like you would have to see it like you claim.
that's what marxists do: no matter what anyone says you find a grievance in it.
wow, you guys are so persistent in your constant attacks.
I don't do that which you said.
in your mind anyone who discusses things openly, and finds the humor in things, is 'baiting'.
but only when you want to badger them.
otherwise all the smack talk is OK, right?
I grew up in a situation where there were a lot of very different people who lived near me in my neighborhood. Discussions of various aspects of ethnicity were always allowed.
I didn't know that mine was a rather unique community. I lived in a town that had a facility that attracted people from all over the country, and the ones who were 'diverse' would chose our neighborhood.
I simply did not know that the whole country was not already integrated until I got to college.
and thus when these chuckle heads accuse me of 'baiting' I find it sad.
That whole narrative never works with me, I was friends not based upon ethnicity.
and in fact ethnicity didn't really matter to me.
sadly this one hated that one and that one hated this one and they all listened to what their parents said and believe the bigotry.
and often one of my friends wouldn't like that I was friends with one of 'them'.
so when I get accused of baiting I feel very sorry for the person who accuses me of it.
I simply don't have that 'they are lesser' point of view, and never did.
why not?
because the state ONLY has ONE facility of that type in it's park system and it's in Roxbury.
see:
https://www.mass.gov/guides/list-of-state-parks-by-region
Curley was elected while he was in prison to be Mayor again, that is how much the people loved him.
PS: I am not saying I thought Curley was a great person, anon, but that Healey is far worse.
I guess my point is if you're going to be a criminal politician you ought to be one who shares with the public and ends up seen-as broke at the end of it all.
you can hate Curley all you want but he was loved by the citizens and he helped a lot of people survive through the depression.