Anonymous ID: 1f16e6 Feb. 2, 2024, 11:07 p.m. No.20349783   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20349653

I pretty much love that Elon bus station thing, but when having a reentry capsule of some sort,

 

is there benefit to having that thing first "drop" rather steap into athmosphere, or like have gravity grab it, for heat and time with heat and stuff, to then have it get into a flight movement?

like having wings fold out?

or like using the shape? or like using the shape with change or gravity inside, making for rotation and air stability with a wing/flap

like design?

 

too much speed over ground not ok? change of center of gravity making it rotate or tilt in a convenient way?

 

airplane, "every one to the right" would be a meme, not one I want irl in tv though.

 

for stability, maybe something like having stripes (rather stable ones) become weak and wavey as well as stiff and guiding on command (or reactive as standard?)? like stripes at the side of that capsule thing?

 

like indicated in that one movie with pen wooshing around mr director of nasa, having a "ball of gravity" come out of that thing with characteristics making for nice stearing? with two/three stripes? or only one? one bc possible to quickly release? release by all two/three? shape of that capsule being fail save anyway for stripe use?

 

for first seconds of start, prolly burning a lot of stuff, why not use catapult thing when you are so tricky in flying that you can even land those things?

4 fat balls rushing down on that conveniently huge thing and a ton of fuel saved?

8 balls even better?

 

magnetic field movement? additionally?

 

with that huge weight even a "quartz crystal" twitch push being worth a try?

a thing when timed? buzz buzz buzz buzzzzzzzz?

 

have that ball of gravity get handed over a portion of the speed?

making for convenient flight curve and landing?

how to divide one airplane into two?

how to divide a falling ball into two falling "things"?

have a thing come out shaped in a way dragging speed with two points? like a big ball and little ball with some connection and flaps/drag to it?

having speed be turned into a turning movement?

 

anti-prop?

 

prop folding out being twisted row sort of?

prop folding out not twisting a rope but doing a twist charge sort of leading to prop blades turning around? making for 2nd and 3rd and so on slowing down circle?

this being possible with few small selfchanging props as brakes?

 

or only tension of rope thing adjusting blades?

 

failsave option of quickly adjusting landing spot, like mving plane on 2d plane is prolly not a thing, maybe tilting (is quick even needed) is a thing making for some off chance landing scenarios feasible?

maybe a sort of funnel to guide the rocket in? needs to be very stable? does it need to be very stable if not 4 bended tubes but a funnel as wrapped around bended surface?

having tilt plate as well as one arm for grabbing on to a thing? big pillow? rocket breaking like tree making sure capsule or stuff is not hitting surface hard?

 

from a physics pov, the rocket should prolly be able to sort of melt on the ground like a ball of fudge I guess.

 

having a ring for plate for the boosters to have it readjusted by shape of ring/pit where booster fires into?

if near fail, go left, have left to right push anyway by pit, sort of thing?

have a spike thing in the ground in the mid of plate (where is mid?) to have the booster more spread and less pointy when being close to ground?

 

have trapdoor matrix set up on that whole plate, making for less booster here, tilted booster there?

have selfadjusting trapdor matrix set up on plate? "booster here? ok, push to there, but not too much…"

 

maybe funny, but maybe future thing, better to have controlled roll over of whole rocket (tip to bottom and back) with controlled stop? learned movement with known rocket maybe better when in doubt?

have astronaut capsule disconnected as astronauts are used to?

have potential neck breaking forced inside turned into forces turning/moving inner capsule?

 

have uplift force (huge ball or whatever, magnetic, quartz) stored when landing?

 

when in space, have "release" weight rather than air booster to operate movement of space station?

 

have magnets pull station to space ship? magnets on stipes, meeting first?

placement of doors? middle?

 

Elon, I do accept bs btc speculation in the nearish future.

 

<3

<33

11.

77.

Anonymous ID: 1f16e6 Feb. 3, 2024, 12:05 a.m. No.20349883   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9887

>>20349783

>from a physics pov, the rocket should prolly be able to sort of melt on the ground like a ball of fudge I guess.

lowering center of gravtiy? also for slowing down? like dropping weight to bottom of rocket? water and stuff?

could heated up parts in the bottom be cooled down by also adding up some water weight?

do you maybe blow that stuff off?

having tip of rocket control by stuff being blown off? no airoutlet booster on top? air movement around/near the rocket? twisted? inner capsule disconnected?

umbrella like air on top effect? shifting center of gravity/turning?

>lowering center of gravtiy?

>shifting center of gravity/turning?

I would sort of feel thing, maybe overreaching for visibility sort of, that the point of gravity of a rocket is below the rocket, bc of the way I assume it to move/tilt as well as bc booster flame burning thing (from physics pov this is a reach I guess). maybe this is only true when assuming it flying? maybe when landing the center of gravity wants to be flying wise low and forcing "go there" as well as standing/holding/slowing in a dancing / ropewalking on a point "balancing"?

maybe having boosters controlled not only in aim but also in force is a thing? maybe not when rocket so heavy? weight or center of gravit(ies) / weight distribution? when most critical flying state? aim for that? one sweet spot or two important ones?

>maybe having boosters controlled not only in aim but also in force is a thing?

how does booster work?

is a booster different when pushing up as when landing?

is it "just forcing that thing up" with a broad full force booster in a way and not that much balancing bc sort of going up anyways?

is it same when lifting bottle of coke? does it feel different when putting it down?

do you have same time balancing when going down slowly as when going up slowly?

does it matter how fast you get faster when going up? does it when going down?

when being critical near ground, do booster little (or much?) more to lift up again? booster in still wrong direction with more force then?

Anonymous ID: 1f16e6 Feb. 3, 2024, 12:07 a.m. No.20349887   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20349883

when balancing bottle on finger, this seems hard on a tip and more easy on (even a slight) dip, it does not really feel harder when holding down on the top trying to simulate force.

how does it change when you hold it at bottom with one finger and simulate force of weight down with hand wrapped around, or hand only two fingers? two fingers hard to do? two fingers of another person? just thinks.

would it help to have the rocket bended? like some of those large busses?

being combinable with other stuff? bend while turn on spot (arrow down)?

 

future? 'calculating and making move center of gravity' is the thing naturally approached by you walking my ways of live? some of them I as son like much?

Dopplereffekt?

>with that huge weight even a "quartz crystal" twitch push being worth a try?

>a thing when timed? buzz buzz buzz buzzzzzzzz?

 

Elon, why not use tunnel thing to have huge electro magnetic weight dropped to get that first second of (full burn? landing?) booster lift of more efficient? just thinks.

knowledge about buzzing as well?

Anonymous ID: 1f16e6 Feb. 3, 2024, 12:45 a.m. No.20349930   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9932

>>20349887

>>20349889

future? 'calculating and making move center of gravity' is the thing naturally approached by you walking my ways of live? some of them I as son like much?

Dopplereffekt?

>with that huge weight even a "quartz crystal" twitch push being worth a try?

>a thing when timed? buzz buzz buzz buzzzzzzzz?

 

is there a need for a thing to buzz? or is that astray thinking, in this case, to be wardned and done for fun?

water? when there is only buzz drive and no booster there maybe is no warmth, but could water be buzzed better when changing state of aggregation while being buzzed?

could water be (statistically for all, or aimed at in groups?) put together to nicest of snowflakes for best buzzing?

how could "gravity" and maybe with that movement be "handed over" at the (bottom of the) rocket?

 

making surrounding more heavy to be more light? border? not ever border? grabbing and pulling as striped pullover to be pulled over "upwards movement" in that "pullover"?

 

does water provide for that ice expanding thing to be used? dunno if useful, but is a thing.

can ice underneath a rocket be used for "expanding" that "room with rocket" upwards?

 

can a tune buzz a rocket upwards?

can a tune altering left and right push a "flat" rocket upwards?

 

can a tune fit the quantum mass things buzzing? is there mass more ideal then others for being buzzed?

quartz being a thing being able to slightly push when being put voltage to?

snowrains being pushed of as boost?

just thinks.

 

melting of ice/snow stuff being used in a wirbelrohr (effect) sort of way?

"tricking" mass into thinking "ok, here seems to be the spot" in the same way "warmth is being led by effect"?

 

do not overburden, angels do spawn. ;)

thinking is fun and makes heavens itself learn in a rather fast way.

 

ad.on, ay?

o7

 

Benjamins and Comfyness.