Which bread will win?
Anon has been focusing primarily on things which can't be posted (not because they're sensitive or anything, just that by their very nature not everything can be presented in a digital format). However, anon has noticed that there are a few substantial holes in the scope of what happens here, and would like to point towards them.
First and foremost anon notices that this board remains fixated on rooting out every possible angle for attack against western powers exclusively. This presents a serious danger, as failure to address corruption elsewhere in the world could easily result in a situation where Russian and Chinese armies obtain enough of an advantage to deploy physical force, eliminating western societies and cultures, taking out the bulk of those who are interested in rooting out corruption and further entrenching their own underworlds with advanced computer technology, making it nearly impossible to address. Related, several significant areas of interest which anon has passed by upon his journeys are how the existence of Tartary (which occupied territory now claimed by Russia and China, among other nations in the region) was written out of the history books in 1912, as well as the existence of a massive worldwide feminist cult based in South Korea named the World Missionary Missionary Church of God, who's leader claims to be the physical manifestation of the Christian God on Earth.
Anon apologizes for not presenting sauce, but neither issue is particularly difficult to find information on, and anon is currently busy with a particularly fascinating thread elsewhere.
Anon would also like to suggest that time and thought is set aside for the consideration of how and why corruption takes hold within human societies, as removal of corrupt individuals without addressing the factors which enabled them to persist and thrive would only create a power vacuum to be quickly filled by others.
Agreed, there has been mention of China and Russia, which is good, but the issues their people face largely get ignored here from what anon has seen.
Anon posits that if the primary area of concern regarding Epstein is how blackmail was used to capture and control political and social organizations, then a pervasive surveillance structure such as the Internet presents an absolutely gargantuan threat if the dynamics of said blackmail are not considered.
If we are facing a massive shift in the power dynamics of the globe, anon would suggest that their problems could very easily become our problems quite rapidly should their people find no appetite for addressing them. The global adoption of English puts us in a particularly vulnerable position in this regard, where everyone can easily spectate our efforts to root out western corruption while maintaining relative freedom to express their own corruption more openly without foreign attention.
Do you believe that horrific child abuse is the only thing that can be used as leverage against someone? Consider how threats against those a person cares about could be leveraged to obtain influence as well.
>1st time ever I think anonymous has been granted the hidden hand
Anon is curious if it would tickle your fancy to expand upon this particular line?
A very compelling essay on the subject of the origins a trajectory of human communication.
http://www.edarcipelago.com/classici/JJRousseau/Rousseau_Jean-Jacques_-On_the_Origin_of_Language.pdf
Thank you very much for sharing, that did indeed help quite considerably.
That's worked so well for you in the past.
If only you knew how bad things really are.