>>20371751
the repetition lets you know to filter this persona.
It pretends to be a voice to hear, but it's yet more agency propaganda.
the war party doesn't want Putin interviewed so they try to slander Tucker in any way that they can.
the Dictatorship is going into fits realizing that their time is soon up.
what is a feeble agency attempt to justify spamming the same story three times in a short distance of bread?
if the news is important than it pops out at people.
saying that I'm slandering when in fact it's the other way around is you projecting.
'you built'
the collectivizer: the persona who blames the anon for all the neffarious work of sots in the dictatorship.
The bully persona.
when they are outted and faced with someone who knows how to obviate their nonsense and projection they raise their fists in anger and use threatening words.
> 1b6ae5
Ah, so that's who you are
this is the bigot persona who can't discuss issues without pejoratives for the various catagories of slander that it projects.
and then when called out as a bigot says that saying someone is a bigot is 'hate speech ' (usually in an IP hop) and then badgering the person for the rest of the bread (with a different persona, or they pass the badgering on to a cell mate (cubicle mate)
and of course I can't really know the back story of who these people are, if they really work for an agency, or are cellmates (cubicle mates), though that would make sense.
They don't relent on the badgering and talk in the the second person plural in phrases of blame.
>>20371914
>>20371912
>>20371909
>>20371918
this persona eats the breads with repetitive spam that doesn't give any insight into anything except for it's own bias.
when you post to it often it's already deleted by the time the post shows up.
if you comment on it you get attacked by it and other anon.
if you filter it, it shows up again anyway having IP hopped.
it fixates on describing MAGA personalities like Jack and Steve.
>>20371927
note that it is being deleted as fast as it posts, because it continues with constant slanders against Catholics, not understanding that the groups that are associated with Catholics don't always agree with each other.
that some Catholics write about how the current pope is a kind of 'suffering' that we must endure (suffering is considered necessary in this life by Catholics, as it is a feature of human existence and helps people to toughen and become holy, and compels them to pray more, etc.)
this persona hates Catholics and can't see that the billions who are and have been Catholics don't all support the various charties that glom onto the Catholic Church, or that various orders of Catholics are often times (and this has been true through out history) opposed to each other.
>>20371949
in a free speech forum the various ideas are here, and that there are 'bad actors' running it has been true from time to time through out the history of Q Reasearch.
and if you want insight into why: you might review the post that Adminstrator made last evening.
The Administrator is the one who runs the whole site, not just the board. And it's not up to him to delete posts, nor is it up to him to manage the every day details of a particular bread.
'Bad actors' have always been (some) of the bakers. and that's just the way it's always been here at Q Research. Get used to it.
>>20369304 (pb) Jim's post in bread #24990 about how sometimes bad people run these breads.
how does what you said disagree with what I said and what Jim said and what Q said?
are you here to patronize all other voices in these breads? why is it your role to do the 'little babby is sad cause he's bullied' bit?
why would you think that it intimadates the anon?
Many Feds who are still taking a check are run by people who are traitors and marxists, for the most part.
why say degenerate stuff like suggestions of a nuke.
if you don't care did you not see that most are good?
yes, the management is bad, and the congress is cuckold, but if what you suggests happens it would be the murder of millions of innocent people as the result.
you better care.
Pig is Pig. He's been consistently Pig and never really been usurped.
ya, you can disagree with him, like when he did the Mr. Nig thing (I don't like that) but it's some guy at his house who when he posts puts one more layer of anonymity on it by putting his posts on top of a picture of an adorable feline.
Do you have any idea where the original of that is?
I'd like to see it in person sometime. I did see it once or twice when it was in Boston, but it's not there anymore.
"Insanely valuable stolen paintings that are still missing: Works by Van Gogh, Vermeer, Rembrandt, and more"
This story is from 2018.
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/03/06/valuable-stolen-paintings/
are you saying that you really think that Mr. Pig is giving us a self-portrait?
if you're all upset about Mr. Pig and his cat meme, why don't you also scold those who post Pepe and Apu?
the ones who post those aren't posting self-portraits either.
imagine when you see a Pig post that it's just the text.
so you object to the constant repetition of 'America Winning'?
does that give him 'name fag' status?
One of the main reasons that fame-hounds are discouraged is because if they do get fame, and they are MAGA folks, then they put themselves at great risk and become targets of the Left.
Thus fame-fagging is greatly discouraged.
But for those who cross the line, like Anjel G, and they doxed themselve so much that everyone kind of knows them: people don't like them still doing it because well, it's annoying. But anon don't want them to come to harm.
thin.
is that the best you got?
"'Winning' is division?"
now do:
"Right is left?" and
"up is down?"