The DC Appeals Court ruling on immunity has identified a 5 D Chess dilemma unfolding before our eyes.

Jack Smith unlawfully appointed means he cannot act on behalf of the US Government.

Now comes the fun

• DJT stops proceedings with immunity appeal

• Jack freaks out and asks SC to skip DC Appeals

• Meese and Professors call out Jack as unlawful ( This was actually done to help Jack. Never trust Academia, they used "the name" of a 92 yr old man to rush the question before DJT wanted it brought out)

• SC rejects Jack's request without giving a reason so we have no idea if the reason was as Meese says, Jack has no authority to speak to SC. We still Face that question

• DJT lawyers were told to be prepared to respond to Meese's brief

• DJT lawyers said "Not at this time" so Appeals Judges couldn't address it in the ruling

• DC Court of Appeals made up their own rules giving DJT 6 days instead of 90 to file with SC but also stated their weakness that if En Banc takes the case then it will be stayed again.

• DJT appears to have only 1 option and allow a rushed SC hearing ( NOT)

• DJT can allow Chutkan to get the case back then wait a couple of weeks, file a motion to dismiss the case based on unlawful appointment of Jack, starting the whole process over on this issue. The advantage to this would be to get past April when SC stops hearing cases and schedules any new case for next term.

• When Jack requested SC take the case away from DC Appeals he never went through the Solicitor General ( because he has no right to represent the USA)

• SC must first address whether Jack can even be there to argue DJT's appeal. WOMP WOMP WOMPThe Dilemma

• DJT has not asked a Court to answer that question yet so how does this play out?

Possibilities

1. SC demands Jack answer in a brief ( not likely)

2. SC demands Solicitor General to answer in a brief ( more likely)

3. SC allows DJT to argue but not Jack (interestingly possible)

4. SC denies cert outright based on Jack not being lawful and directs lower Court to hear the issue by saying the subject is not ripe due to the unresolved question ( most likely scenario)

>>20371837 The SC are cowards. They would prefer kicking the can and not addressing it. J6 trial is on hold until immunity question is answered. The April date is about getting past SC's deadlines for hearing a case. The SC cannot be forced to take any case on emergency. They decide if it is an emergency. My guess is SC will take the opportunity to punt this case and never answer

>>20371878

Oral arguments on the Co Ballot issue is tomorrow at 10 am. Audio will be available. DJT gets 40 mins and the other side gets 40 mins split between SoS and plaintiffs

>>20371921 I suspect the SC will put out a ruling no later than 2 weeks. Sooner if they get a unanimous, or close to it, vote.I hope Scott Pressler gets nominated as her replacement. If so, every person planning to vote DJT should send RNC 5$ to show we are done with RINOs and happy they did as we wanted. If everyone sent 5$ they would fill their empty coffers overnight. That would send a huge message

>>20371959 I agree with you in principal but the fact remains, we are not in a position to end parties yet. We have to play the game on the field that exists. Is Scott wins, he will spend the money to get out the vote, prove these Globalist big donors are not match for a united We The People, and Scott could withhold money from RINO campaigns , only spending on America First

>>20372008

Need to keep our eyes on the prize. If you are concerned about the ballot case, look how all States since CO ruled are handling the matter. No Court has even been interested in removing DJT. That makes a strong signal to SC they shouldn't rule in favor. There is no appetite for this

>>20372063 there is no appetite by State Courts. I expect at least 8-1 ruling. KJB might hold out and vote removal is Constitutional

>>20372093 Think of it this way for a minute anon.

Just like the Tacoma Bridge collapse and the Walls of Jericho, this movement is waking people up at such a fast rate, we people uniting has met and exceeded the natural frequency of the Globalists and their World is collapsing. Steady march of tens of millions will bring them down. The weak within their ranks are folding already ( notice late endorsements to DJT)

>>20372170 The SC doomed themselves as the 3rd branch of Government when they rejected hearing the TX election case. They failed as an entity to Safe Guard our Constitution. It is something we will have to re vamp at some point. They must be required ot answer to We The People

>>20372258

the events exposed a weakness in the design of SC. They must be elected or we can face this again one day

>>20372233

>>20372281

I as listening to Robert Gouveia a few days ago and a similar question was asked. I always thought it undid every decision if they were found to be corrupt. He answered that it would undo all decisions related to the corruption only