Not ONE single Officer was able or willing to acknowledge the most basic component of the First Amendment. NOT ONE! 10 out of 10 failure. Where are those anons yapping about ‘just a few bad apples’?
All that can be said ‘for’ such “LEOs”, is that somehow/someway they all silently decided that further violation of their Oath was just too risky in front of a camera.
Dear anons:
After five+ years reading the five thousand “Qs” and the millions of digs, comments, memes and prayers here at this very interesting QResearch bulletin board… i am compelled to speculate that Q and Trump could/might/must be referring to a different “Military” and different “Law Enforcement” than is colloquially known here in ‘Merica Speak. Military is most commonly a reference to U.S. Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, Coast Guard and now Space Force. Law Enforcement Officer is commonly referencing average Police, Cops, Patrolman/woman.
Correct?
If that is correct, AND less than 1% have demonstrated functional knowledge of the Constitution and Bill of Rights… then how in Heaven’s name can such a “Military and Police” EVER be trusted to deal with the abject sedition and treason currently plaguing America?
If Q and Trump are being sly… then how can Q and Trump be trusted to help guide a way off the Precipice which We the People are facing?
Honest questions searching for simple honest answers. Thank you.
I am far more WITH you anon, than against any of what you wrote. I have been greatly inspired by this entire Q thing. And Trump has amazed me over and over. I hope, wish and pray for Trump to be successful both for himself and for my tattered dear country America. Thank you and may dear God bless us all in our search for a true and honest world together.
My question about the “Military and Law Enforcement” remains. I am open minded [enough] to consider the possibility, that a switch-out of top leadership, both POTUS and upper Command… can simply tell [order] the Order Followers to do the righteous and Constitutional things. In the end, i still hope and pray the the Order Followers will come to terms with their own responsibilities to think for themselves and that they and only they are in the position to gauge “Orders” against the “Oath”.
….please dear Lord above.
As far as thisanon is concerned, being turned down by the CIA would thus lend great weight to a person’ Character (Tucker’s) which the CIA can not risk to let inside its doors.
Funnynotfunny, now watch the CIA make claim upon Tucker, to smear Tucker’s name. Hehe, the CIA is that stupid.
>>20384361
Putin spoke of the Russia that existed long before Bolsheviks and the Soviet Union. Russia still exists now AFTER the Bolsheviks and Soviet Union. Correct?
It gives this anon hope for America to survive our own infestation of Soviet Bullshitviks. Eh?!?!
>>20384424
What little information this anon is able to glean from current day Russia, the place looks clean and proud and vibrant.
My current day America, is emitting Soviet style depressions in most every direction. Current day Russia gives this anon a little hope that my memory of my previous America can survive and be great again.
Funny how U.S.Gov, Media and Big Western Insitution hates so much that Russia survived its Soviet period.
>>20384474
As i wrote in the subtext, my America is being illogical in every direction, much the same as Soviet-era Russia.
Sound effects or especially if real, the bell ringing and tweeting birds is fucking highlarious!
>>20384577
Basically.
And the Bullshitviks before that too.
If so… then one must consider that Tucker is being (weirdly) ‘used’ for a Controlled Demolition of western Intelligence.
The modern western Intelligence Community is a fog-filled hall of bent funhouse mirrors… so i can totally see the IC doing something that schizophrenic.