>pen at Camp David
Can you explain? This was before my time. Why was this pic BS?
It really is disturbing seeing people be so culty when presented with evidence like this.
Maybe some of the cultiness isn't organic, and is from shills? After all, if Q isn't what he says he is, he would have no qualms having pro-Q shills.
Cognitive dissonance is very strong here and on reddit the past couple days. Also, what's up with the bakers not putting stuff like this in notables? To any rational person, these pictures are extremely damning. Do not we have rational bakers?
Also, did you notice how the China pic slid the board after the whole AF1 thing? Something is really fucky.
This explanation makes no fucking sense. Q obviously tried to play it off as him having legit access to AF1. And claiming reflections get around natsec? LUL.
It's so out of character for Q to be so sloppy and defensive.
And then the latest post is "disinfo is necessary". Pretty obvious damage control. Extremely disappointing.
I disagree. Q's authenticity and the true nature of what Q is is a huge deal.
I agree that the movement is good and wakes people up. WWG1WGA
My working optimistic theory is that the Q psyop got handed off to Trump-sympathizing media/journalists. I'm sure everyone noticed the change in tone of Q posts after the May-June hiatus.
These people get inside scoops which gives the Q psyop legitimacy and traction. However, these people got sloppy. Since the first pic of DJT's eyebrows fooled everyone and no one discovered the original photo, they thought they could get away with the AF1 hoax as well.
This theory would explain how Q could have access to insider information and coordinate with POTUS, but not necessarily be a WH insider… and also why Q would make such an amateurish mistake.
I think you are approaching this from the wrong angle. The picture is indeed a reflection, but it's simply a reflection of a printed out photograph. You can actually see in Q's pic slight image doubling, indicating it is a bona fide reflection.
The thing is fake >>2038813, the matter in which Q faked it certainly less relevant than the fact that it's faked.
Q isn't simply a LARP. Q's either the real deal or some sort of black hat or white hat psyop. Q is an important cultural force, so it is prudent to learn as much about Q as possible, whatever the truth may be.
Also, I was 100% on board with Q until the AF1 pic. I've spent a lot of time on Q. So I'm pissed.
I understand that. This is how it was done tho:
-find high resolution of whatever (potus/Af1)
-do minor tweaks in photoshop (stretch a few things)
-Print it or display it on a high res monitor
-use the back of a phone or other reflective material to line up the shot at a skewed angle
-Take a photo of said reflection
-pass it off as an original (because online image searches will not be able to find it)
Not sure what the ELA version is tbh. You're more knowledgeable than me. The image doubling wasn't my observation, it was another anon's.
Lmao ik. I'm a newfag re: post formatting and I didn't feel like referencing your post number again.
okay wow i get it now… lmao didn't realize you were the same guy from that original post………………………….
Yep. We are making a difference. I just don't want us to follow a pied piper. All anons need to be vigilant at all times. Even if it means taking the Q movement forward while abandoning Q (somehow)