>>2038526

Anons, i feel this is important to pay attention to. I have been following Q since early november and have always believed in him. this recent issue with the af1 picture has me a little concerned though. Q told us that the picture was taken off the reflection of an iphone cover. when you view the pic on this site and use the ELA function you can see something daunting, that the apple somehow starts in a larger radius than in the picture Q gave us. you can click on the pic too, this way you can line your mouse up with the ELA version of the apple and see that it ends outside of the apple in Q's pic. I seriously want to know what everyone thinks about this. I swear to god im not a shill by any standard and am just looking for the truth in all this. Is it possible for this to occur with a reflection or is there some other explanation or whats going on here?

http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=bf5fc1603396f63959428d0a7a6b941431ae192b.243020

>>2038993

im not familiar enough with how photos work to know for sure if thats whats causing this. what it might be is that the apple logo itself is just actually causing this to happen.

>>2039015

this actually makes sense now that im looking at the picture again. would this cause apple logo in the ELA version to be bigger than the one in Q's picture though?

>>2038813

ok wtf is going on here… Q actually needs to adress this shit now.

>>2039034

use this link, on the left hand side click ela and you will see what im talking about Anons, i feel this is important to pay attention to. I have been following Q since early november and have always believed in him. this recent issue with the af1 picture has me a little concerned though. Q told us that the picture was taken off the reflection of an iphone cover. when you view the pic on this site and use the ELA function you can see something daunting, that the apple somehow starts in a larger radius than in the picture Q gave us. you can click on the pic too, this way you can line your mouse up with the ELA version of the apple and see that it ends outside of the apple in Q's pic. I seriously want to know what everyone thinks about this. I swear to god im not a shill by any standard and am just looking for the truth in all this. Is it possible for this to occur with a reflection or is there some other explanation or whats going on here?

http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=bf5fc1603396f63959428d0a7a6b941431ae192b.243020

>>2039055

oh lol i fucking forgot that i copied my response, rip. well the link is on the bottom sorry for the spam there

>>2038813

can i have the original stock photo for the one with trumps face?

>>2038813

alright, the only explanation that i can come up with that doesnt implicate Q as a larp here is if that stock photo was released after Q gave us his version of the pic. where did you get the stock photo from and is there any way to know what date that photo was taken? the reason why this is very concerning is because we know for sure he was trying to pass it off as proof. for one he tried saying that it was a picture taken in the oval office, then theres also the fact that there is a phone obfuscating trumps face which heavily implicates it is supposed to be taken as proof that Q is close to potus. either way, we really need to know when this source photo was released.

>>2039208

well…. thats many months before Q posted his version of the pic. honestly im really confused right now because we really have seen so many insane coincidences, some of which have been extremely specific. this though really doesnt sit well with me… its clear to me that something is going on here, we are being lied to. if trump still publicly recognizes Q as legit then il 100% believe but this really fucked my brain up. its the fact that there really isnt any explanation he can give us that makes this look good for him.

>>2039244

what the fuck are you talking about, Q literally posted a picture of potus and tried to pass it off as proof that hes close to the president, when in reality he took it from a stock photo that has already existed for many months. look i was 100% in on this, and i acknowlege that very insane coincidences have occured that only someone with inside knowlege would be able to produce, however this is just very off putting to me. it doesnt make sense and we all should be asking questions now.

>>2039268

i really dont know anymore anon, im at the point where im gonna need a confirmation from trump on Q's legitimacy to continue taking this whole thing seriously. Im still going to pay attention to Q's posts, but i wont be doing so religiously anymore.