>>2038754

he did, more than once. Conclusion is that we're all in this no matter what fake stuff Q gives us as "proof".

We have not collectively challenged Q on anything. As soon as we discovered Q photographed a reflection of another image he played it off as a "troll" then said it was "disinfo". Read the two breads after his af1 post, it's all there in real time.

Today I found the source to iPhone_Twitter_WH.png and made an extremely shitty photoshop to show that it was again indeed taken from a stock image online (that i found in about half an hour of digging).

I'm still trying to find the source for iPhone_Tweets.png but it's tough to find.

This is how I think its done:

-find high resolution of whatever (potus/Af1)

-do minor tweaks in photoshop (stretch a few things)

-Print it or display it on a high res monitor

-use the back of a phone or other reflective material to line up the shot at a skewed angle

-Take a photo of said reflection

-pass it off as an original (because online image searches will not be able to find it)

All of Q's posts with POTUS or in highly secure locations are blurry as photos that have lots of distortion and have (smudges) and other shit on them. Why?

To cover up the fact that they are not original.

>>2038824

Don't want to address the problem here? Make it about belief? Does this hurt the movement? WHY THE FUCK WOULD Q DO IT THEN?

>>2038813

BAKER PLEASE MAKE THIS NOTABLE

We need to settle this. Q must address this. This is 100% proven fuckery on Q's part. If Q is legit, this is easily explained. But so far Q has doubled down on originality, at least in the AF1 pic. (claiming that he took the photo to look EXACTLY the same as the stock photo online.

>>2038860

It's fucking real. I get called a shill and CIA for doing the work myself, discovering how these "proofs" are made. I'm the bad guy here? I thought we were about Truth on this board?

what the fuck happened to WWG1WGA?

>>2038861

That explains nothing. Q tripled down on it being legitimate. What message does that send to the Cabal?

Q has yet to address the second picture which was taken in the same manner and we were meant to think that he took that photo and there was a 1m delta between that pic and Trump tweeting… it's used as a fucking proof of Q, and it's fake… WTAF

>>2038877

here is the source so you can check yourself, hair lines up, only thing that doesnt is the second red line, which makes me think original was shopped or the reflective surface had some kind of warp int it.

>>2038909

Chances are it's Potus right ear, the other two are flipped horizontally because it's in a reflection. I've been searching most of the day and can't find it.

>>2038864

I was there for it. there were 3-4 of us anons pushing for this to be addressed at the time. Q posted china pic but we kept pushing. on target for sure.

>>2038884

wrong. The image is an exact reflection taken from the exact same position as the source. Either Q lined up a shot being reflected off the back of an iphone set up in the exact same position as the source image (free standing mind you) OR Q took a snap of the reflection of the source image.

>>2038934

OK thank you anon.

>>2038915

There are a couple dozen of us weathering the shitstorm from people that claim Q is infallible. Q posted these passing them off as legit, and we're just supposed to sit here and claim that there is no merit to this honest criticism? Where is your head at anon?

>>2038946

whoever made this gif didn't warp it enough to fit, remember it was reflection off of the back of an iphone… how close do you need it anon? How HARD would it be to replicate if you were standing there… think about it

>>2038978

my guess is photo was taken through the bottom of a glass. need to find the original to overlay

>>2039009

Do we consider Q an anon? Because that is what he was saying just "minor differences"

>>2039015

I have to explain to anons how i think it was done, just posting it and saying look just gets all the "muh shill" fags out.

>>2039039

Thats copypasta from my post KEK

>>2039049

not quite. we'll find it, keep digging

>>2039052

That's what I expected from Q when we first called him out, he instead doubled down on it being real, then tripled down on it.

>>2039047

Need to pressure baker.

>>2039071

If Q isn't legit, then it's possible that the CABAL isn't going down… stick with me… We haven't got ANY proof of crimes, nothing that would stick in any court. We have connections between people/businesses/flights/etc.

NSA just deleted most of their recorded data (good? bad?). Awan got off (Good? bad?). People are still walking free. MSM still controls everything. Potus has been gaining ground, but only because of the online activity partly due to this board and Q's work.

Question remains, without Q's confirmations is POTUS /ourguy/? Can we see Cabal movements in his actions? Iran? We don't know enough, we're kept in the dark on everything.

>>2039089

why? when "the world will know" this month? If it's going to be confirmed, why fuckery?

>>2039107

Well shit, if the Q movement goes mainstream now, with how many thousands of "followers" and gets proven to be a larp and a "national security threat" bye bye internet freedom.

>>2039108

Posted here>>2038901

>>2039125

>>2038813 Anon calls into question Q's proofs

BAKER NOTABLE

I won't ask again, but i'll be back to share my findings again and I'm certain I will find more. This needs to be addressed. It needs to get into notables if not global. We deserve an explanation.

>>2039185

Proof of fuckery isn't notable? Because it calls Q out? we're not supposed to challenge? No free thinking? Sweet jesus.

>>2039194

Hairline doesn't match up, I don't think so but I couldn't find Trump. Worth a shot if you want to give it time.

>>2039195

AF1 photo is 2015 as far as I can remember.

second is here http://time.com/5110480/donald-trump-planned-parenthood-protections/

>>2039224

Thats why he tripled down on it in his posts, he said he was trolling, then said the af1 pic was different than the source.

Something wrong here. I was 100% on board before this dropped.

BAKER

Are you scared to take the heat? is that it? Afraid everyone is going to call you a shill? Truth will reveal. If this is all on the level then there is no reason that Q would flee from it.

ANONS

We are playing in the realm of espionage. These fuckers do this shit for a living. We have to be extremely critical as to not walk into traps. If that means questioning Q and POTUS we must. We cannot be slaves to our desires for a better world, we have to keep thinking.

>>2039257

My county, nice try shill. No counties here.

>>2039270

you got the wrong guy faggot, bombs away.

>>2039287

And if Q says "congrats you fags passed the test" everything is fine?

Goodnight. Thanks for using your head in this mess.

>>2039293

help find the source to that picture, we need the original pic, the one Q used to take his picture of POTUS.

>>2039295

Baker will not budge on it. Need to just keep posting it until another Baker does.

>>2039305

Yet every time it gets posted and brought up, many people are seeing it for the first time and demand question.

This is probably one of the biggest notables thus far.

>>2039311

Godspeed anon!

>>2039319

And the people that only come to look at notables? This will only be seen by few Anons that are active.

How does this get resolved by sweeping it under the rug?

>>2039325

So you're going to cover it up? The images posted above are somehow "nothing"?