What if it wasn't the DS that chose him?
As we know, that person portraying him in the media is definitely not Biden, thus he is known as Bidan.
>What's the alternative? 😎
If I have to explain, you are either not an anon, haven't been paying attention for the past 61/2 years, or are pulling my dick and it's a rhetorical question
Anon goes with the latter.
Anon makes no assertions from the image posted.
A true image captures but one moment in time, however an online pic or two proves nothing in this digital age.
>“sticky wicket”
Why would an American spokesman for the WH use a term from the English game of cricket?
A sticky wicket (or sticky dog, or glue pot) is a metaphor used to describe a difficult circumstance. It originated as a term for difficult circumstances in the sport of cricket, caused by a damp and soft wicket (playing surface).
As anonAmericanon, is the term common in the US?
Anon believes 0% of what anon reads unless it was also physically witnessed by anon in real time, and even then, the credence only rises a little, but anon retains the information as but one possibility.
I'm sure all your male associates (for surely you have no friends) would gladly help you out with this, but my 3 children would challenge your assertion.
Have a great night and go fuck yourself.
It is said his father was, but there could still have been those that joined for altruistic means, but found themselves caught up in the web of deceit and deception and then found no way out. It is said Tucker was rejected when he applied, but, really, who knows the truth behind the public façades?
>Just trust yourself. You’ll know.
The thing with Tucker is that there are many topics he has never publicly touched upon and this makes anon leery.
Not to mention some of his dubious associations and reluctance on releasing the J6 tapes he purportedly had access to that were never released.
Still, this a movie after all.