A few passing thoughts. First, I'll just say my view on the authenticity of Q changes daily, if not hourly and it is, and has been, disheartening that any legitimate criticism has always been met with hostility and defensiveness. Honest examination deserves better than a "kys" response. It's fucking juvenile.
That said, what has been glaringly omitted in this recent round of "Q is a larp," is any mention of two past events. People, it seems, have great difficulty in admitting they might be wrong.
The first is when people posted as BO/BV and told a tale of how they created the Q narrative as an inside joke but it grew too large and had now spun out of control. I can clearly recall reading a post by someone who was coming clean and apologizing for his role. He was attempting to sound the alarm. Over time those posts were dismissed and eventually forgotten.
The other was the period when Alex Jones and Jerome Corsi said they had inside knowledge that Q, in his recent form, had been co-opted by black hats and had become a disinfo campaign. That disclosure was met with "muh Corsi," "muh Infowars," and "muh joo" responses. They were discredited and the band played on.
In the eight months or so I've been here, anytime I posted the slightest hint of 'concern,' or a hope for greater clarification or, G-d forbid, positive headlines in the news (in response to direct quotes by Q), I was shouted down. Again, one lesson I have learned while here is how strongly, and to what degree, some people will go to prevent their belief system from being challenged.
Again, I admit to being confused as to Q. Unfortunately, sowing confusion is one of the primary goals behind agents of discord and those wanting to discredit the Great Awakening. I think we have reached a crossroads at this point. Arguing that 'disinfo is necessary,' or admonishing us to 'trust the plan,' in my opinion, has run its course. The 'movement' has grown too large and too much effort has been expended for those retorts to suffice. Perhaps selfishly, I have 'muh feelings' that my contribution and many hours devoted to helping 'the plan,' deserve a bit more than, what has become, simple platitudes. It is imperative that a measure of clarity be provided. If, however, Q is proven a larp that should not detract from the important work we've done nor should it discourage us from questioning the many aspects of society we have come to understand are not as noble as have been presented. Though we should continue to trust in the goodness of humanity we must also no longer doubt this isn't Kansas anymore.