>>20401246 (pb)
'national discussion'?
how so?
it can only be a personal discussion.
you don't understand pearls before swine?
it means : the person or thing or creature has not the capacity to understand.
a national discussion implies a national religion. We have a secular state and a government that pretends to be against the establishment of religion, but meanwhile has tried to force secular humanism as the creed.
and the disgusting satanist pop-tarts of the porn industry, gussied up as 'pop stars', to be titular goddesses, even if they are men.
many anons are prayerful and spiritual.
we endure those who pretend to have the power to 'destroy' our 'perceptions'.
and we tell them straight out that they don't get it.
if you think mockery is a 'plus' as you say, that tells me a lot about you. Mocking is a kind of name calling, I suppose. Implying that the person is less than the one doing the mocking.
it hearkens from the 'I'm OK, but you are not OK' point of view, the view of a bully when they take it to mocking.
and then you saying 'their ego is so fragile' really does hammer home you having the unhealthy "i'm OK you are NOT OK" point of view which, to me, means that you are incapable of getting out of what I might tell you because you don't respect me as a messenger.
but here I am answering your post hours later.
Maybe you'll see it and get some insight into your own brokenness in how you interact here.