Weishaupt, who was a member of the Illuminati, tried for many years to infiltrate freemasonry and recruit masons to the Illuminati
When he was banished from Bavaria for his treason. Dig on who he took refuge with, the co leader of the Illuminati, and their eventual marriage into the British crown. Sax coburg gotha.
There has always been human sacrifice. I believe cannibalism is the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Most specifically eating the pine cone that the ancient god art of multiple vanished civilizations shows in the little baskets.
As Q said they feed on our negative energy- I think he was referring to the inter dimensional beings we call demons.)
So They influence humans to do bad things
And in return give them power etc. true contracts with the devil. And they literally eat our souls this way and fuel themselves in it.
So God in among the other Sodom Gomorrah and Noah-flood wipe outs he’s done, realizes we can’t win this on our own. The evil is too tricksy. So he sends Jesus to take our place forever in their evil rituals of torture and sacrifice.
Not only to show us the way to ascend from this banishment we’ve put our selves in, but to make sure, if we accept this gift, then No more can the feeders eat our souls.
Oh we can still be killed or made to suffer but they can’t harvest our soul from a saved death.
Of all ancient civilizations who practiced sacrifice and/or cannibalism, where we are able to determine why they did it, they did it under the belief it gave them power. They still believe that. It’s time for us to realize why they believe it to this day, because they -are- receiving evil power from it.
The rainbow is the promise we will not be flooded out large scale any more. (Which is why they’ve co-opted it- they think it also meant they were free to do as they please without risk of wiping out. And a slap in the face to the One who made the promise).
After the rainbow we get to choose which side to be on.
It’s all there. Treat the Bible as you would any other 1000s year old ancient manuscript.
How I got there: being a historian specializing in the Roman Empire, and finding out that 7 Roman Emperors wrote about the problems their governor Pontius Pilate caused for Rome by executing a man called Christis. All within 70 years of the execution. I make that benchmark, because the last eyewitness to the execution, Josephus, a Hebrew historian who documented the events, died.
Tiberius, the Emperor at the time of the crucifixion, first wrote about Christos and bitched about Pilates’ poor handling of it, only 7 years after the crucifixion.
Once I saw how large was the historical documentation of Christis, — not only these 7 contemporary emperors but 2 Toman historians, 1 Roman senatevscribe, 1 Hebrew historian and 1 Hebrew general all documented these events within 70!years of the crucifixion.
It is such a weighty preponderance of documentation. No other ancient person had as much corroborating evidence. Not Hatshepsut, not Boudicca, not even King tut. Cleopatra had as much written about her by Roman historians as Christis did. If we treat their writings if Cleopatra as truthful, we have to apply the same to Christos.
Why the church doesn’t like to focus on Christ as a living historical man. 1) it takes away from His divinity. And 2) the followers of Christos became a very rebellious and seditious bunch. They caused so many problems for Rome, as the emperors complained.
And we’ll, the Roman Emoire never really fell. It just changed hands and branding.