Anonymous ID: 0a2137 Feb. 14, 2024, 9:42 a.m. No.20412635   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2678 >>2786 >>2815 >>2873 >>2993

Bongino covering the story on his radio show

 

> https://rumble.com/v4ddrx3-live-the-dan-bongino-radio-show-021424.html

 

Livestream Tonight 6:30 pm ET: ==Explaining Russiagate Exposé

Explaining the first of a multipart series ==cowritten with Michael Shellenberger and Alex Gutentag about the corrupt origins of the Trump-Russia investigation

Matt Taibbi

Feb 13, 2024

 

Apologies for any inexact language, I’m dictating from the road back from Ithaca.

 

This afternoon a story came out on Public that I co-wrote with Michael Shellenberger and Alex Gutentag. Like our previous collaborations, this is a breaking news story, one that we worked on for many weeks.

 

Without giving away the whole story, this first installment relies on a never-released classified report to describe a broad political espionage campaign that reportedly involved at least 26 Trump aides and associates. I strongly urge anyone interested in the topic to check out the article, titled “CIA Had Foreign Allies Spy On Trump Team, Triggering Russia Collusion Hoax, Sources Say” on Public.

 

However, this is a very complicated story with a lot of moving parts, and as material comes out today and tomorrow I wanted to create a livestream so that I could walk readers through what we actually have in this story.

 

For those interested in attending, I will be back home tonight by 6:30 pm and you can visit the stream at the following locations:

 

> https://www.racket.news/p/livestream-tonight-630-pm-et-explaining

Anonymous ID: 0a2137 Feb. 14, 2024, 9:51 a.m. No.20412678   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2786 >>2815

>>20412635

>Bongino covering the story on his radio show

DB

It was an information laundering operation.

CLowns need to flush the crap story down several pipes to land inthe FBI cesspool…The Mushroom farm. Feed em crap, keep em in the dark.

 

pipe: Harry Reid

pipe: Killary campaign, Mook, Jake Sullivan, etc.

pipe: Sidney Blumenthal/Cody shear. State department

pipe: DOJ..nellie and bruce ohr

Pipe: Fusion GPS. were hired as fall guys.

Anonymous ID: 0a2137 Feb. 14, 2024, 10:07 a.m. No.20412786   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2815 >>2952

>>20412635

>Bongino covering the story on his radio show

 

>>20412678

>the FBI cesspool…The Mushroom farm. Feed em crap, keep em in the dark.

 

We finally going to get the Cruz marker?

 

2657

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 1bfec6 No.4630322 📁

Jan 6 2019 15:09:09 (EST)

When will the public discover that Ted Cruz was also illegally SURV(pre_POTUS_R nomination)?

C_A 'illegal' SURV members of Congress?

C_A 'illegal' SURV members of the Press?

C_A 'illegal' SURV SENATE INTEL COMM?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/10/cia-senate-investigation-constitutional-crisis-daniel-jones📁

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/01/world/senate-intelligence-commitee-cia-interrogation-report.html📁

Who ordered the SURV?

What justification was provided to AUTH SURV of ELECTED OFFICIALS?

SURV fall under scope of FISA warrant or internal to Dept or outsourced to FVEY?

Reality check - friend or foe, we all spy on each other?

Should we be spying on ourselves?

Should we be tasking others to spy on ourselves in order to avoid U.S. law?

Was FVEY established & designed by the INTEL COMM as a backchannel SURV apparatus to avoid domestic laws triggers and Congressional/Senate oversight?

What keylogs exist to monitor FVEY intel collection?

What ability do former GOV officials have re: ability to access C_LEVEL FVEY offshore data?

How did HRC gain access to highest CLAS SAPs (closed system access) and able to transfer to remote/home server?

(Q above should scare every single American)

How did CHINA locate primary C_A assets within CHINA [187]?

Money buys POWER.

No punishment [Brennan] by HUSSEIN ADMIN re: SURV of Senate etc?

Logical thinking, why?

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article24770296.html📁

Justice Dept declines to pursue?

Fake News media limits exposure to public?

When did @Snowden breach NSA & PUBLICLY RELEASE (CRIPPLE) INTEL GATHERING ABILITY (NSA)?

NSA targeted?

Where did @Snowden work prior to NSA contractor ACCEPT?

What SENIOR LEVEL GOV/C_A OFFICIAL rec @Snowden for NSA contractor OFF/TAR position?

Post public release of CLAS NSA PRO U1?

Where is @Snowden today?

What country was involved in U1?

If real target country was VENEZUELA or ECUADOR - why didn't @Snowden take a direct flight from Hong Kong to those locations?

How many direct flights run daily from HK to V&E?

If @Snowden was C_A/NSA would he not understand (simple logic) going public PRIOR TO END DESTINATION SAFETY would 'LIMIT' ACTIVE PASSPORT TRAVEL ABILITY due to block_DEREG?

WHY WOULDN'T @Snowden PUBLICLY RELEASE INFO AFTER HE ALREADY WAS SAFELY AT FINAL DESTINATION?

Why then would @Snowden route through RUSSIA?

Was RUSSIA final destination?

Was RUSSIA true destination?

Could @Snowden be seen releasing CLAS programs/intel FROM INSIDE OF RUSSIA?

What role did BRENNAN PLAY in the @Snowden leaks re: NSA?

What was BRENNAN's background re: SAUDI ARABIA?

Does the C_A hold blackmail on political leaders?

Does the C_A protect those who protect them?

Why are ex C_A contractors running for office?

How many ex C_A contractors are currently in office?

Hello, [AS].

Once an agent, always an agent.

Q

Anonymous ID: 0a2137 Feb. 14, 2024, 10:11 a.m. No.20412815   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20412635

>>20412678

>>20412786

hurr durr

just a coincidence

 

House Intel Chairman announces ‘serious national security threat,’ sources say it is related to Russia

Natasha Bertrand Katie Bo Lillis Annie Grayer Kevin Liptak

By Natasha Bertrand, Katie Bo Lillis, Annie Grayer and Kevin Liptak, CNN

2 minute read

Updated 12:49 PM EST, Wed February 14, 2024

Anonymous ID: 0a2137 Feb. 14, 2024, 10:41 a.m. No.20412993   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3072 >>3116

>>20412635

>Bongino covering the story on his radio show

>>20412873

>>20412952

 

CNN idiots ran this story because they believed the Russia Collusion Hoax

 

British intelligence passed Trump associates’ communications with Russians on to US counterparts

Jim Sciutto Pamela Brown Eric Bradner

By Jim Sciutto, Pamela Brown and Eric Bradner, CNN

3 minute read

Updated 12:49 AM EDT, Fri April 14, 2017

 

Washington CNN —

 

British and other European intelligence agencies intercepted communications between associates of Donald Trump and Russian officials and other Russian individuals during the campaign and passed on those communications to their US counterparts, US congressional and law enforcement and US and European intelligence sources tell CNN.

 

The communications were captured during routine surveillance of Russian officials and other Russians known to western intelligence. British and European intelligence agencies, including GCHQ, the British intelligence agency responsible for communications surveillance, were not proactively targeting members of the Trump team but rather picked up these communications during what’s known as “incidental collection,” these sources tell CNN.

trump russia jared kushner carter page erik prince

 

The Russia story just keeps getting worse for President Trump

 

The European intelligence agencies detected multiple communications over several months between the Trump associates and Russian individuals – and passed on that intelligence to the US. The US and Britain are part of the so-called “Five Eyes” agreement (along with Canada, Australia and New Zealand), which calls for open sharing among member nations of a broad range of intelligence.

 

The communications are likely to be scrutinized as part of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russia’s efforts to meddle in the 2016 presidential election.

 

“If foreign intelligence agencies share information with US intelligence, and it’s relevant to the investigation, then of course the intelligence committee will look at it,” a source close to the Senate investigation told CNN.

 

The Guardian reported earlier Thursday that British alerted US Intel of such contacts.

 

GCHQ’s surveillance became politically sensitive when Trump – citing an uncorroborated Fox News report – claimed that Britain had tapped his phones in Trump Tower at former President Barack Obama’s behest.

trump putin kremlin manafort flynn composite

 

Who's who in Trump-Russia saga

 

White House press secretary Sean Spicer repeated Trump’s claim and cited Fox News’ reporting about GCHQ’s surveillance to reporters in the briefing room. “Judge Andrew Napolitano made the following statement, quote, ‘Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command (to spy on Trump). He didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA … he used GCHQ,’” Spicer told journalists.

 

Those comments angered British officials. After Spicer’s remarks, White House officials told CNN British ambassador to the US Kim Darroch and Sir Mark Lyall Grant, national security adviser to Prime Minister Theresa May, “expressed their concerns to Spicer and Trump national security adviser H.R. McMaster” in two separate conversations.

 

The GCHQ also issued a statement saying: “Recent allegations made by media commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being asked to conduct ‘wire tapping’ against the then President-elect are nonsense. They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.”

 

Last month, Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, R-North Carolina, said that “based on the information available to us, we see no indications that Trump Tower was the subject of surveillance by any element of the United States government either before or after Election Day 2016.”

 

https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/13/politics/trump-russia-british-intelligence/index.html

Anonymous ID: 0a2137 Feb. 14, 2024, 10:48 a.m. No.20413035   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20413015

>LIst Bongino was given by his source long time ago.

Bogino says Killary team had Russians reach out to these people so Brennan could have 5 eyes spy on them.

It was a global intelligence hit on trump and they had to cover itup

 

 

Presidential Transition

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

 

 

By Kenneth P. Vogel and David Stern

 

01/11/2017 05:05 AM EST

 

Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

 

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

 

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

 

The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.

 

Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don’t think we’ve ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we’ve seen in this case.”

 

There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race.

 

Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.

 

Russia’s meddling has sparked outrage from the American body politic. The U.S. intelligence community undertook the rare move of publicizing its findings on the matter, and President Barack Obama took several steps to officially retaliate, while members of Congress continue pushing for more investigations into the hacking and a harder line against Russia, which was already viewed in Washington as America’s leading foreign adversary.

 

Ukraine, on the other hand, has traditionally enjoyed strong relations with U.S. administrations. Its officials worry that could change under Trump, whose team has privately expressed sentiments ranging from ambivalence to deep skepticism about Poroshenko’s regime, while sounding unusually friendly notes about Putin’s regime.

 

Poroshenko is scrambling to alter that dynamic, recently signing a $50,000-a-month contract with a well-connected GOP-linked Washington lobbying firm to set up meetings with U.S. government officials “to strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian relations.”

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446