Something is wrong with this guys.

We have not collectively challenged Q on anything. As soon as we discovered Q photographed a reflection of another image he played it off as a "troll" then said it was "disinfo". Read the two breads after his af1 post, it's all there in real time.

Today I found the source to iPhone_Twitter_WH.png and made an extremely shitty photoshop to show that it was again indeed taken from a stock image online (that i found in about half an hour of digging).

I'm still trying to find the source for iPhone_Tweets.png but it's tough to find.

This is how I think its done:

-find high resolution of whatever (potus/Af1)

-do minor tweaks in photoshop (stretch a few things)

-Print it or display it on a high res monitor

-use the back of a phone or other reflective material to line up the shot at a skewed angle

-Take a photo of said reflection

-pass it off as an original (because online image searches will not be able to find it)

All of Q's posts with POTUS or in highly secure locations are blurry as photos that have lots of distortion and have (smudges) and other shit on them. Why?

To cover up the fact that they are not original.

>>2041890

Not until this shit gets reasonably explained. Legitimate digging was done and has been dismissed over and over again.

>>2041953

Your clearly representing a different image than I showed.

>>2042131

We can't hold Q responsible. There is too much emotional attention held by non-autists. No way to break through cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias.

>>2042096

Q passed off the AF1 video as an orginal shot INSIDE af1, then claimed he was trolling, and then claimed they set it up to look the same and there are (minor differences).

Q has NEVER addressed the same technique used when he posted the second image of POTUS. If you were here you would remember, we couldn't figure out the first one, so he posted iPhone_Twitter_WH.png and followed it up with a 1 min delta to a potus tweet, it's used as a fucking proof.

>>2041882

>>2042360

Did you learn that move from the left? Can't argue with the facts so you attack the source?

Do it yourself and see how they line up.

>>2041882

If you understand how it's done as laid out above, it's easy to replicate.

>>2042478

How fucking HARD would it be to replicate that photo. Use your fucking head anon? Never heard of photoshop? Q would have had to be standing in AF1 holding 2 phones and line up the shot absolutely perfectly to get such a match… why would he do that? Oh yeah he said he was "trolling" I thought "this was not a game"…