twitter "Q" discussions are up.
public awareness is climbing.
as people learn, and head towards sources of information, 'disgust' is the best way to turn them away.
he's asking great questions, tho.
asking for proof. asking people to defend their claims.
WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT Q ASKED ANONS TO DO.
this is why proofs are important.
if one guy can shoot down every claim by simply asking "why?" then what good is any of this?
>Q links to Lee
>people flock to Lee
>Lee asks for proof
>people give proof
>Q gains public legitimacy organically
seems like a decent plan.
being a proper journalist involves filtering claims, or else he'd just run around chasing his tail.
bring a claim, back it up, convince him it's worth investigating, rather than just shouting "IT'S WHAT I BELIEVE BECAUSE I'M NOT LIKE THE OTHER SNOWFLAKES".
Lee is on fucking point.
then show him the proof. don't just tell someone to go look for themselves.
be PROUD of what you know/think/believe.
back up your thoughts with statements of proof. critical thinking is the only way forward.