>>2042166

I never cared much about the fuzzy images Q posts, so the question on whether they're real or fake means little to me.

The things that convinced me Q is real are:

1. Lots of incidences where Trump reflects Q on Twitter.

1. 4,000 indictments. I know it's 40,000 now, but I was sold at 4,000!

1. Executive order declaring a national emergency over human trafficking.

1. About 3,000 mysterious "retirements" of high profile names.

I have no idea why Q posts fuzzy images even if they're real, and I have no idea why he would post fakes if that's what they are. All I know is I "trust the plan" regardless, because of point 1 to 4 above.

>>2042198

Well, Q is certainly "real", the question is a real WHAT?

I believe Q is doing good, but I realize the people doing this cleansing may very well have an agenda of their own, and not necessarily one I'd agree with 100 %. Still, what choices do we have here? To cite David Wilcock (of all people!), the Alliance taking down evil players may not be the Alliance you want, but it's the Alliance you got!

There are several names among those declared to be /ourguys/ I'm very skeptical about. But if they are indeed part of an effort to bring down ABSOLUTE EVIL, then so be it - I'll take their help!

Regarding why Q doesn't tell us to "demonstrate peacefully", I think I can give you an answer:

Such demonstrations would lead to blood flowing in the streets, and the movement would be blamed. This is because the evil ones WILL use every opportunity to cause murder and mayhem, then turn around and blame it on us in the media. It's just not a great strategy.

Q seems to be planning on doing the actual takedown without our help, through a carefully orchestrated legal circus! All he/they wants from us, is for us to provide an anchoring point for truth in our local communities once things go hot. Q wants us to be the calm at the center of the storm, and to calm down our friends and families so this thing can be done with minimal casualties.