>Good morning
>Thursday morning
>Mornin' Ralph… Please pass the Covfefe.
>G'Mornin' Anons… Another Day at the Office.
> 02/15/24 (Thu) 07:09:52
Zero delta
23 seconds
kek
> 02/15/24 (Thu) 07:09:29
>Good morning
>good morning Ralph.
>Green Berets Framed In Vietnam By The CIA
>“I would call [the binder] Trump’sinsurance policy,” said someone knowledgeable about the case. “He was very concerned about having it and taking it with himbecause it was the road map” of Russiagate.
2914
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 03/02/2019 19:30:07 ID: 388cb1
8chan/qresearch: 5471098
Image Name: DXa8-lCVMAEEP3X.jpg
Filename: 1d3973c51feb3ee33e29f8f26abb6369fc98bad133b1e35f55fe2b7604c63911.jpg
Emphasis on mistakes not corrected.
"Time to start looking at the other side where real crimes were committed." - POTUS
Time to reveal our insurance policy?
TRUTH always wins.
Q
2927
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 03/03/2019 00:58:40 ID: 84ae7e
8chan/qresearch: 5476830
Anonymous 03/03/2019 00:50:12 ID:871c6e
8chan/qresearch: 5476676
>>5476642
So it was known what was happening with DS, but this trip happened in 2016?
>>5476676
POTUS formally announced his candidacy on June 16, 2015.
Why did the HRC campaign actively work to push POTUS as the 'right' candidate for GOP?
Why did the HRC campaign publicly attack POTUS' opponents?
Why did the HRC campaign want POTUS to be the nominee?
Did the FAKE NEWS play along?
Think pre_nominee.
What 'set up' 'insurance' file was created 'assuming POTUS would become the nominee?
POTUS 1.
CRUZ 2.
Was CRUZ the target of a separate illegal spy campaign?
Q
2843
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 02/20/2019 21:57:03 ID: e7ef6b
8chan/qresearch: 5295136
Anonymous 02/20/2019 21:45:24 ID:adf50c
8chan/qresearch: 5294864
THE END IS NEAR and THERE WILL BE NO CHARGES AGAINST THE PRESIDENT
John Solomon
on Hannity
>>5294864 (/pb)
But, you knew that already.
Hence why [AS][SDNY][MW]are attempting to keep the ‘insurance’ scheme ongoing post Mueller.
FEAR.
The fun begins directly after.
Will make the Super Bowl look like a puppy show.
Q
PB below
>>20414867, >>20415046, >>20414866, >>20414898 Update: 22 shot, 2 dead in Kansas City Super Bowl parade mass shooting
>Huma
She's hiding her left hand
Federal Law on Spousal Privilege
Federal (and many state) courts recognize two types of spousal privilege:
Spousal testimonial privilege, barring testimony against a spouse in a criminal trial, and
Marital communications privilege, barring testimony about confidential communications between spouses.
Spousal testimonial privilege
This type of spousal privilege has been recognized throughout history and pre-dates our Constitution and even our country. It arises from the notion that married spouses are one entity and so are not competent to testify against themselves through their other (if not better) half. Under this type of spousal privilege, one spouse cannot be compelled to give testimony against his or her spouse who is a defendant in a criminal trial or the subject of a grand jury proceeding. The accused spouse may claim the privilege or the other spouse may claim it on behalf of the accused spouse. The spouses must be married at the time that the privilege is asserted; so an ex-spouse can be compelled to give testimony about a defendant to whom he or she was previously, but is no longer, married.
Exceptions to the spousal testimonial privilege exist where a spouse:
is charged with a crime against the other spouse
is charged with a crime against a child of either spouse
is charged with a crime against a third party in the course of committing a crime against the other spouse
is asked to testify about matters pre-dating the marriage, or
is charged with human trafficking for immoral purposes (such as prostitution)
In each of these situations, even current spouses may be compelled to testify against an accused spouse in a criminal trial or grand jury proceeding.
Marital communications privilege
Neither spouse can be compelled to testify as to private, confidential communications between them in either criminal or civil proceedings. But, only communications that the spouses intend to be, and maintain as confidential are protected. Not every statement between spouses is confidential or a communication. The same exceptions listed above apply to this type of spousal privilege. With respect to the marital communications privilege, as long as there was a valid marriage at the time of the confidential communication between the spouses, the privilege may be raised by either spouse even after the marriage has ended.