Anonymous ID: 3b1458 Feb. 15, 2024, 5:31 p.m. No.20420850   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0876 >>0893 >>0945 >>1008 >>1095 >>1198 >>1271 >>1364 >>1514

>>20420837

>CIA has evidence RUSSIA FAVORED CLINTON IN 2016 AND WANTED HER TO WIN

 

CIA 'Cooked the Intelligence' to Hide that Russia Favored Clinton, Not Trump

 

https://hotair.com/headlines/2024/02/15/cia-cooked-the-intelligence-to-hide-that-russia-favored-clinton-not-trump-n3783032

 

The Trump-Russia scandal made its formal public launch on January 6th, 2017, when the office of then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper published an Intelligence Community Assessment, or ICA, dominating headlines and upending the incoming Donald Trump administration. The report declared Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an “influence campaign” in the 2016 presidential election — they never used the word “interference” — to “denigrate” Hillary Clinton and “harm her electability,” thanks to a “clear preference for President-elect [Donald] Trump.”

 

It was powerful stuff. And dead wrong.

 

“They cooked the intelligence,” says a source close to a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia scandal, whose full findings have until now been blocked from release. “They made it look like Putin supported Trump,” the source added. “The evidence points the other way.”

Anonymous ID: 3b1458 Feb. 15, 2024, 5:47 p.m. No.20420923   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>20420893

“More gravely, they said that CIA Director Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts,” Fleitz wrote.

 

“House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election,” he added. “Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.”