Mike Benz Gives Background Context on Internet Censorship Programs 1/4
February 16, 2024 | Sundance |
The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. “What I’m describing is military rule,” says Mike Benz. “It’s the inversion of democracy.”
CTH readers have discussed this issue for several years. What Benz describes in the video below is thereality of what systems and tech architecture are in place right now. The big picture of who wants control over the domestic internet apparatus and how. WATCH:
https://youtu.be/CRYSKaS-XtQ
It is important to begin with the end in mind. Perhaps some people are unaware that internet services, meaning the actual experience of using theinternet for communication and commerce, are not the same in every nation. In fact, it is quite a different experience depending on where on the globe you are located. The differences are driven by internal controls, the intranet of the regional internet per se.
The internet in China is not the same as the internet in Europe, which is not the same as the internet in Australia, which is not the same as the internet in North America, which is not the same -at all- as the internet that now exists within Russia. Even in some continents, theinternet traffic flows are controlled at different levels within each nation. The “world wide web” is a format, but when you get down to the national level, things change.
This baseline helps to understand thatinternet freedom is defined by access to information and commerce.
To the extent the information or commerce is defined as against the interests of the authority structure, or potentially athreat to the national securityinterest of the government therein, the internetcontent is filtered, modified, censored, removed or just simply blocked from view. This isone layerin the information control system.
Another layer is the flow of commerce that floats atop the flow of information. This is where advertising, product sales, purchasing and general e-commerce takes place. This layer represents another option for control; therefore, this e-commerce layer should be considered running in parallel to the information, albeit perhaps indirectly attached.
(Pic map of the world split up)
When western government applied economic sanctions against Russia via financial restrictions writ large, the layer of internetcommerce control merged with the information and national security controlsystems of the internet.
Russian citizens were blocked from e-commerce access, specifically from western nations in alignment with the sanctions, and the mechanisms of online purchasing were restricted. However, the entire world did not participate in the sanctions, and there is a massive amount of e-commerce that takes place, even with the systems of western control financial blocks in place.
Additionally, there is alarge black-market systemfor commerce and financial transactions that started organically in the aftermath of the Russian sanctions. Crypto currency, as a financial transaction mechanism, was predictable; however, over time people became even more strategic and alternate transfer systems were created. You can purchaseadvertising in Russia, but are you really purchasing advertising– or are the purchasers really just transferring funds? Think about it.
I share that Russia example, because I do not want people to get too disheartened inwhat is going to happen here in the United States. There will always be a market for information, regardless of the control systems that are created to stop it. Additionally, there will always be smart rebellious people who think of ways to subvert the intents of the control mechanisms.Freedom may be diminishedfrom a raging fire to a small burning flame,but it will never be fully extinguished. WE just need to learn to adapt.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/02/16/mike-benz-gives-background-context-on-internet-censorship-programs/