>>2043076 (lb)
>Why post a bullshit pic that can be shown to be faked or at least fakeable?
It has been shown to not be faked (at least not in the obvious way), but it is of course indeed "fakeable". We live in the age of Photoshop after all...
Here's my take on why "Q" posted this:
Your friendly neighborhood POTUS wanted to give his anon friends something special for 4th of July, so he decided to troll them, to show he's One Of Us.
It's kind of awkward really, but it's the thought that counts!
>At this point we don't need any more proof.
>
>They have provided PLENTY of that.
Agreed. I certainly don't come here anxious to be convinced it's all for real, I come here to see how The Plan is progressing before it's all in the news, whether the current controllers of the MSM wants it to or not.
Which it will soon be.
The picture is CLOSE to the stock photo, but there are several small discrepancies that proves conclusively it's not the same image. It could of course still have been faked, but not in the obvious way by just pointing a phone at a screen with the stock photo.
Haha, once again POTUS starts talking about the same topic Q just brought up here!
How many times has this happened by now?
This is what desperation smells like.
I lost the image that lists various small differences between Q's image and the stock photo, but I pointed out a previously unmentioned discrepancy, and an anon was nice enough to highlight it for us. See pic.
>You seem to have uploaded the thumbnail, sir
Indeed.
The original was posted here:
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2043227.html#q2043311
Lines meet in a lamp corner in one picture, but not in the other. This proves the images are not the same, and one of them can not be a reflection of the other. You are either too dumb to follow along, or a shill.
That's a 1-man party bro.