Anonymous ID: a2fe41 July 5, 2018, 11:16 a.m. No.2043324   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3350 >>3382 >>3392 >>3468

>>2043263

At this point we don't need any more proof.

They have provided PLENTY of that.

I don't think Q meant for us to take this so seriously...

 

If you are still desperately latching on to every Q drop looking for "proof" then you either havent been with us long, or need to go back and read the past.

At this point Q firing off a pic from AF1 in a reflection would be "trolling" from their perspective, basically teasing to the cabal who knows the second that Q is actually revealed and POTUS is forced to acknowledge it will be the beginning of their end.

Playfully posting things that are dangerously getting close to proof but aren't actually (pics of POTUS, pics of AF1) is them trolling the cabal about going more public soon.

Anonymous ID: a2fe41 July 5, 2018, 11:21 a.m. No.2043392   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2043371

>>2043324

>At this point Q firing off a pic from AF1 in a reflection would be "trolling" from their perspective, basically teasing to the cabal who knows the second that Q is actually revealed and POTUS is forced to acknowledge it will be the beginning of their end.

 

>Playfully posting things that are dangerously getting close to proof but aren't actually (pics of POTUS, pics of AF1) is them trolling the cabal about going more public soon.

Anonymous ID: a2fe41 July 5, 2018, 11:24 a.m. No.2043431   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3447

>>2043405

These graphic show nothing.

They call attention to extremely minor differences that are explained by the distortions created in photoshop, or merely the distortions created by an imperfect phone surface held at an angle to reflect.

Anonymous ID: a2fe41 July 5, 2018, 11:27 a.m. No.2043478   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2043435

Q-clock is a masterful exercise in reading tea leaves.

There is no solid methodology, you just have a toolkit of potential methods that you apply to every single drop and tweet every day, and occasionally pull out something possibly meaningful, using a different method each time.

Unless you can use it to solidly predict something, or to unlock a clear relation between past information that can be verified, then shut up about your tea club.

Anonymous ID: a2fe41 July 5, 2018, 11:33 a.m. No.2043559   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2043475

Don't worry anon, at least know there are at least 2 people on this board who know have a basic functioning knowledge on reflections and light.