I like the guy..that said, he hasn't shown me any reason to vote for him yet. We refuse to establish another quasi-royalty family dynasty.
Getting ready to WorkFag….Montana tonight will be the opportunity to be heard and acknowledged. No WWG1WGA chants….it has to be a "QAnon" chant…something that can't be ignored and something that will go over live airtime…hopefully with a nice #QAnon sign right there front and center.
You get it….Apple has imaged/mirrored classifed info somewhere in its system..cloud or other.
Q's question of whether a reflection breaks NATSEC laws should be answered affirmatively. Otherwise, anyone could photograph classified info in a mirror and claim innocence.
You sound like a Bloodline faggot. We vote for people based on qualifications, not DNA.
Q didn't ask if HIS picture violated NATSEC laws necessarily, he asked
Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.
Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?
Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?
Image provided here has been distorted (stretched).
Q
With 'reflections' emphasized. Mirrors are reflections, and YES they do violate NATSEC laws if the info pictured is classified.
Yeah, I think she is hot - but she strikes me as someone that would get off being dominated by someone much stronger. Not the boytoy type.
Are Slingshots still legal there?
The info itself is classified, not the particular medium. A reflection of classified info is still classified info.