We have not collectively challenged Q on anything. As soon as we discovered Q photographed a reflection of another image he played it off as a "troll" then said it was "disinfo". Read the two breads after his af1 post, it's all there in real time.
Yesterday I found the source to iPhone_Twitter_WH.png and made an extremely shitty photoshop to show that it was again indeed taken from a stock image online (that i found in about half an hour of digging).
I'm still trying to find the source for iPhone_Tweets.png but it's tough to find. If another Anon can find it please post
This is how I think its done:
-find high resolution of whatever (potus/Af1)
-do minor tweaks in photoshop (stretch a few things)
-Print it or display it on a high res monitor
-use the back of a phone or other reflective material to line up the shot at a skewed angle
-Take a photo of said reflection
-pass it off as an original (because online image searches will not be able to find it)
In regards to the AF1 pic;
THINK AUTISTS
-How HARD would it be to replicate the stock image 1:1 whist standing in AF1 taking a photo of a reflection on the back of an iphone? As Q claims it was done to "troll"
-How come the image is warped in Q's photo? If he was standing in 3D space, the image would not warp in the reflection, it would keep its dimensions (try yourself, try to warp something using a flat surface to reflect it off of) This only works if it was a 2D image.
THINK
All of Q's posts with POTUS or in highly secure locations are blurry ass photos that have lots of distortion and have (smudges) and other shit on them. Occom's razor faggots need to man up and speak.
This is done to cover up the fact they are not original.
Believe or not in Q I don't fucking care.
Two possibilities exist
-Q intentionally did this to teach us something and the autists here were MEANT to figure this out
-Q tried to fool us