Anonymous ID: f07a1e July 5, 2018, 1:29 p.m. No.2045490   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5518

>>2045339

From the allegedly "fake" picture of 45 and the phone, the focus wasn't on the fact he had a picture of the president, it was due to the 1m delta of the tweet. This picture also is another message. I think your post is close to the message. If Q had actually taken a "real/legit" picture, it would be a violation of NATSEC…He can't just take "legit" pictures that would be classified and disperse them to the public. Everyone's freaking out about him not posting "real" pictures and it's like they've forgotten that the vast majority of the proofs have come from the mathematical impossibility of so many "coincidences".

Anonymous ID: f07a1e July 5, 2018, 1:33 p.m. No.2045581   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2045518

>Think about what that means

Think about what "orignial" means

 

That his pictures are the first of their kind? Which would remain true even if he did take a picture of a picture with something in front of it. But sure, even if you were to win the argument, that he is taking fake pics, how do you explain away everything else?