>>2044105 (pb)

This ^^ guy is making normies think maybe BV stands for Bored Victim.

It's too bad what happened. I'm sure everyone was trying their best in a stressful situation but what's done is done. This infighting is making Q Research look like a bunch if pussies. This is not the time for that. Get back to work digging instead if complaining about losing a position for now. Things may change later. As far as the free speech debate about bans here goes, remember, one man's trash is another man's treasure. I think having people posting what might not seem pertinant to the cause can be beneficial. It can open the mind or expand thinking outside the box. It can create creativity. Researchers that are distracted easily need to learn to lighten up or focus better. Maybe there can be a Board Volunteer that can grab all the investigative research related things and quickly throw them into some other bread thread where only the BVs can post to and some Anons might like to think better while reading that bread. Kind of like the way they save the notables except different. I'm sure for some of you it must seem like you are trying to study in a quiet library that has been suddenly overrun by idiots from shithole countries. But I think the overall influx of creative people here, including the bad ones, creates an overall plus not a minus. Perhaps another option is to create a kind of casual chat bread thread for new people or for Anons that need a good laugh or a break from digging can go to. That may help alleviate some if the noise on the regular research threads. Maybe 25-33% or more which could be bigly if more people come here.