>>20467810

>Can somebody kindly describe this to me for what I am looking at?

At one point Q authenticated using timestamps and timestamp differentials.

https://qalerts.net/?q=timestamp

24 post(s) found containing "timestamp".

Some Anons continue to look for timestamp signals. In the examples (You) cited Anons are matching timestamps, for example 3:24, to a 'matching' Q drop, #324.

>>20468048

> Problem is they never included the sauce with the posts.

The original string of posts were not notable, IMHO. At most, associations between social media posts and drops based on timestamps or timestamp deltas are speculation. It represents an attempt to emulate what /qresearch was, minus the immediate context of the original drops.

>>20468116

>>Only the Sith deal in absolutes..

>That is an absolute.

Then spoken by a Sith, it was.