p1

This was supposed to be just a short rant against a particular psyop, but it turned into something much larger than I was expecting. I got sick of watching shills slide breads and co-op the bakery with this shit. As I wrote, I realized that this connected to more and more things I've either read or experienced throughout my life. Some points I feel need to be addressed before moving on to the main topic because I felt they played a critical role in some of the social engineering. Some of this is writen poorly or flows poorly but it was never intended to be a book.

'Before someone is 21 their brain isn't fully formed yet!' I've heard this quote quite a bit over the last 25 years. And it always gets rolled out when they want to oppress the people somehow. Gun control is the biggest one. 'People shouldn't be allowed to carry guns until they are 21 because their brains aren't fully formed yet! 'They can't make decisions yet and they are unpredictable!' While the age of 21 is very important in this discussion, it's not exactly in the way they describe it. And by 'not exactly', I mean hardcore gas lighting. Does anyone really think the government passes laws for the safety of the people anymore? To protect children? You have to be pretty fucking stupid to believe that, especially after the last 4 years. So when the government banned guns not only from schools, but within 1000 feet of a school it wasn't to protect children. So then why? Why was passing such a law so important? Because the human mind will resist and in some cases actively fight against situations and ideas that it has not been exposed to prior to it being "fully developed". The average person, and a much higher percentage of those raised by single mothers, will never see a regular person carrying a firearm until much later in life. They will not consider people carrying firearms to be normal and think that disarming people everywhere they go is somehow keeping them safer. But they will spend their life growing up seeing authority figures carrying weapons and think that this is normal. And since they will have trouble adapting and experience fear and stress when confronted with an openly armed people they will take actions against it. Effectively they created an army who will fight against people having rights with just a single policy exploiting a function of biology. They don't see the need for it. After all, the world is a safe place and only the government can be trusted to have physical power. How am I so sure this is the case? Because, to a lesser extent, it happened to me. It took me some time to feel comfortable with it after experiencing it for the first time. Censorship falls under this umbrella as well. Why is everything so sterile and censored? To protect children? KEK. The same people taking drag queens, pedophiles, and porn and introducing them to children are saying everything should be censored to protect children, and you think censorship and content moderation exists to protect anyone? The fact that young adults are forced to grow up in a sterile censored society should be a crime against humanity. It's to render the developing mind incapable of thoughts that are dangerous to the elite. How can people get accustomed to the complexity and horror of the world and be able to cope with it if it's considered 'bad parenting' or even 'child abuse' for them to be exposed to such things during the most important period of time when their brain is developing? The desire for some people to treat their offspring as children well after they become adults is a big part of this problem. Their children are adults capable of starting families of their own, and they arrested their development so hard they may very well have the mentality of children. It is, in fact, so fucking bad that we have college students ending up in the hospital because they saw some disturbing images. The average American mind is so weak it doesn't have the facilities to cope with the real world. We needed a plan that involved 4 YEARS of Biden just so the American public could handle being told a tiny fraction of what's been going on. Censorship shouldn't just be a violation of the first amendment, it should also be a violation of the second because it deprives the mind of the weapons necessary to deal with reality. And most importantly the developing mind. It's no surprise writing in modern media and video games is bad these days, these are people who grew up consuming nothing but sterile writing that couldn't contain any "dangerous" or "corrupting" ideas or even violence. Sterile content leads to sterile minds, and you expect any kind of decent writing out of that? But these aren't the only instances of this specific type of warfare. We'll be getting back to this soon.

p2

The false dichotomy, in my experience, is one of the social engineers greatest weapons. Create two opposing sides that are really fundamentally the same beneath the rhetoric, and/or intentionally flawed so badly that you can always pitch people on each side against each other and attack anyone you wish. And in some cases they are engineered in such a way that it grants the ability to outright demonize anyone who thinks outside of the false dichotomy or chooses a third option that by any objective measure would be considered common sense or even scientific. Left vs Right, Republican vs Democrat, Fascist vs Communist, renewable vs fossil fuels, Fox News vs CNN. It all accomplishes the same goals. False choices set up to funnel people into two distinct groups that can be pit against each other. Left vs Right used to mean something when it was authoritarianism vs freedom but a long propaganda campaign fixed that. Now your options for right and left are authoritarianism and slavery, or authoritarianism and slavery. Republicans and Democrats? Called the monoparty for a reason. Which side of the constitution do you want your rights eroded from this election cycle? Renewable energy and 'fossil fuels'? I know 'fossil fuels' is a misnomer but it's commonly understood. Both designed to enslave the population, even if fossil fuel usage didn't start out that way. Renewable is designed to enslave population economically while destroying the environment causing another problem that will need "solving" in the future. While fossil fuels are designed to leave people at the mercy of centralized power structures. All while we've had the technology to replace it with decentralized power systems using passive nuclear technology at the very least. This is ignoring some of the crazier shit that has come out from Navy patents. Fascism and Communism are basically identical. The only real difference being Communism states 'seize the means of production', while Fascism states 'if they don't do what the government says, seize the means of production'. The point being to generate as much conflict and division among the population while at the same time getting them to fight for what you want them to fight for. In some cases fighting for the exact thing they think they are fighting against. Leftist politicians are all about freedom right? That's what leftism is isn't it? While leftist politicians are the most hardcore authoritarians stripping people of their freedoms at every opportunity.

p3

I don't really know how we got to this point. You'd be hard pressed to find someone who didn't think the age of consent laws were bullshit when I was growing up, especially in the older generations. In fact, at least half of the points I detail below were expressed to me in some form by other people when I was growing up. But back then nobody cared about them and basically ignored them because they were almost completely unenforceable. No digital communications the government recorded 24/7 and no genetic testing. Now you can't go anywhere without someone virtue signaling against "pedophilia" by attacking normal people. Unless you consider most people to be pedophiles, which would be ridiculous. We have one side championing the current age of consent laws that have no basis on science, religion, or history, that were put into place by communists, satanists, and pedophiles to benefit communists, satanists and pedophiles. And the other side that consists of literal pedophiles. You're not allowed to be against pedophilia without supporting the age of consent laws, and you're not allowed to be against the age of consent laws without supporting pedophilia. Why do you think MAP was created? But everything in this world is engineered, and this is no exception. The false dichotomy in action. Neither side being presented is the correct choice and in fact both are fundamentally the same. 'But how is being against people having sex with someone "underage" the same as supporting pedophilia?' We'll get to that. Funnily enough, back when I was growing up women didn't seem to be aware of these laws at all. In fact, a couple of women I was forced to turn down were convinced I was gay. So my choices became, have beautiful marriageable women think I'm gay, or risk going to prison for the rest of my life. Just to add a another dimension to how fucked up and unnatural this is. Land of the Free(tm). I mean, do you know how many 13 years olds hit on me when I was younger? Sorry if this didn't happen to you, not all of us were fat troglodytes when we were younger. Of course we're going to ignore the predator label in some of these cases because it doesn't fit the narrative. And do you know how many 8th graders are hooking up to have sex? 'It's because of the decay of traditional values!' I couldn't agree more. And what were traditional values? Oh yeah, marrying off women when they became adults… so they could have sex. Or also frequently, marrying after you found out she got pregnant. So, the marriage before sex thing wasn't exactly a hard rule. All those pedophiles having families and children, such a tragedy.

Since I'm sure there's a few common core graduates reading this let's cover the absolute basics here. What is the definition of an adult? 'Reaching sexual maturity and thus capable of reproduction.' There you go. This should be the end of the discussion, but unfortunately some people don't believe in science or religion so I'm going to have to really drive the point home. The best sign of propaganda is when people throw shit around without actually defining anything. So what is 'underage' or 'minor'? No one wants to talk about how those terms and definitions they're using were created by the government. You know, the same government that hates Americans and children especially? If you want to include state laws, which age are you referring to? It ranges from 16 to 18 depending on the state. And if you want to include marriage laws that can down to 14 depending on the state. Women are the most fertile, and by extension attractive, in their early to mid teens, and this can be easily seen in historical marriage rates if you somehow missed high school. 'Predator!' What are you talking about, women love predators. That's why 18 year olds wear makeup to look 14 again, to attract all those predators right? Men are wired to value fertility and purity for obvious biological reasons, and this isn't going to change just because of a little propaganda. To suggest they should be completely prohibited from using this time to try and reproduce as their biology dictates, the biology created by God may I remind you, is beyond absurd. How much do you hate women and Americans? To tell women they have the option to do anything they want, go to school, be a whore, etc, but starting a family is the one option they aren't allowed to have during their most fertile years? And have fewer children over the course of their life as a result. And every sexual partner they have lowers their fertility further. On top of all that once they hit 21 their brains stop adapting. So they learned how to "date" and nothing else and now will struggle to adapt to being a housewife and mother increasing the rate of failed marriages and the destruction of the nuclear family. That's if they can even pair bond at all anymore. I can't imagine a better outcome for a 'Too Many Americans' communist.

p4

No wonder 1 in 3 teenage women seriously consider suicide. And all the broken families they create? Generates a permanent power base of people to leverage who are slaves to the system and cry out for socialism to help them. This makes a lot more sense when you realize the age of consent started rising to stupid levels after Marxism began spreading through the world. We have thousands of years of human history and no one was stupid enough to think we should have an age of consent significantly higher than the age of adulthood until Marxism came along. But hey, it maximizes the number of single mothers dependent on the system, maximizes the number of children indoctrinated and enslaved by the system, maximizes the number of children sacrificed to abortion for the satanists, maximizes the number of vulnerable unprotected children for pedophiles to prey on, minimizes fertility and reproduction, and destroys the nuclear family (leading to another long list of negative side effects, most of them recursive in nature). Everybody wins right? But even better, you get to forever virtue signal fighting "pedophilia" in a never ending war against basic biology and you get to demonize women who you forced into these situations by making them single mothers. If you were ever wondering why the media, circa 2000, was pushing "academic research" that the age of consent should be raised to 21 'because their brains aren't fully formed yet' your answer is right here. But law enforcement is the best part of this. How do you get the system to defend pedophiles? That one is easy, if you can't make pedophilia legal, make everyone a pedophile. You can create pedophiles by the millions whenever you need to while protecting actual pedophiles. You can dump millions of dollars into fighting pedophilia and they'll find ways to use it to go after normal people and not catch a single actual pedophile. You can endlessly fill the news cycles with arrests and never put a dent in the problem requiring even more money and officers to continue to not solve the problem. The satanists and pedophiles are laughing their way to the bank on this one.

So I guess some congratulations are in order, as far as my life is concerned, you won. I was forced to turn down advances from beautiful marriageable women (this is not even including the ones I could have made advances on) and now I will never have a family or children. And some of those women ended up single mothers or maybe even sacrificing their infant to abortion just as intended. What, you thought the age of consent laws exist to protect children? KEK. Last time I checked, children, being, you know, children, don't hit on members of the opposite sex. Or were even capable of producing children. And we can't forget 'Our government is controlled by pure evil and actively engages in, or assists with, child trafficking, child sex trafficking, and child sacrifice, so raising the age of consent laws over the past 100 years must have been to protect children!' Fucking KEK. What was the age of consent when this country was founded? 10-12 depending on the state? I guess the founding fathers were all pedophiles! It may come as a surprise to some, but the founding fathers were not idiots. They had thousands of years of history, biology, and their own personal lives to draw upon when making these laws. They understood the ramifications of setting the age of consent to something stupid. Can you imagine if all the communism went away? The pedophiles and satanists know exactly what they're doing, but the communists and useful idiots who actually believe this shit? They'll change their tune really fucking fast when they can't offload the financial burden of their bad parenting and idiotic ideology on to everyone else. When they can no longer force everyone else to pay for their single mothers they'll start to wake up to the fact that maybe humans over the past few thousand years had some good wisdom and that the propaganda being fed to people over the last 100 years might be wrong.

p5

'Oh, they should just abstain from having sex!' Yeah, go try to tell a woman in her prime not to have sex. Are you going to pay for the personal bodyguard for 5 years to guarantee that? Because I can't do it, I have to do things like work. That's really the biggest reason why I refrained from starting a family when I was older but not yet too old. In spite of the central bank, CPS, education system, divorce laws, alimony, family court system, child support laws, fake assault and rape allegations, 'me too', mandatory vaccinations (can't even attend college in most states), a country that hasn't had anything even close to a real economy since the 80s, I was still willing to go out and find a woman to start a family with as my standards have dropped considerably over the years. A woman who needs to wear a bunch of makup to look a fraction as attractive as she used to when she was a teenager and probably going to make me miserable in some way? Sure, why not. I was actually in the middle of prepping to do exactly that when I thought to myself, 'what if I was the father of one of those women who hit on me when I was younger?' Nope, fuck that. The thought of having daughters in this country horrified me. What the was I going to do in country like this? Chain her up in her room for 5 fucking years? If she became a woman at 13 her chances of becoming a single mother go through the roof. I can't keep 24/7 watch on her. And it's not like I can just give my permission for some guy to date her. That's not even legally acceptable in most states (is it acceptable in any?). And in the ones where it is no decent man is going to take such a massive risk. What if someone decides they changed their mind and it goes from 'perfectly fine' to 'life in prison'. I could kiss any kind retirement goodbye as I would be forced to take care of them for the rest of my life most likely. The father gets blamed for this kind of crap and there's nothing they can really do, the government ties their hands. 'Oh, you can't go out or hang out with your friends ever, because you'll eventually hook up with men at some point.' is basically the only option. And no after school activities that's for sure.

'But they can't consent!' The cognitive dissonance is so strong here I'm not sure where to start. Where did you get that exactly? Think really hard about why you believe that. It doesn't come from religion obviously, it doesn't come from science, and it doesn't come from worldly experience. You need to try really hard to ignore your own life experience to say that unironically. Myself, not having the memory of a goldfish, remembers high school very well. And, call me crazy, but women actively pursing men for sex seems a lot like consent to me. It's like someone driving to the grocery store, going to the deli counter, ordering a block of cheese, and then when the deli clerk hands it to them you walk up claim she didn't consent to receiving a block of cheese. There were quite a few steps that needed to be taken to get to that point. So where does this belief come from? The government again? The media? Do they just need to repeat something over and over again and you'll believe anything they say? But if you say they can't consent you're lying. Because chances are that's exactly what you did when you were younger. Or would have given the option. Unless you consider yourself a rapist I guess. And I'd bet you consider "underage" sex perfectly acceptable considering you're not crusading for putting high schoolers in prison. As long as it's not with someone who might have the slightest chance of taking care of a child outside of the system right? That's the real evil. Can't have that. They might grow up to value things like freedom and shit. The age of consent is 13 in Argentina, 14 in Germany, 14 in China, and 14 in Mexico. Pedophiles everywhere! If I had a little more tinfoil for my hat I might think they wanted certain bloodlines to out-reproduce less desirable ones. But that's crazy talk, it would take a worldwide conspiracy for that to be the case. And no one is actively trying to replace the natural citizens of the United States, that's insanity. But I am getting a little bit of kick watching their brainwashing boomerang back on them. They were never supposed to be held accountable to the same laws they forced on the people they govern. They would be a part of the club and have access to all the prime women they could want. But even better, it would all become blackmailable too. Raise the age of consent to something ridiculous and you can find a way blackmail most politicians. Most people honestly. CEOs, military, government workers, etc.

p6

15 years ago I made a comment to someone that if they didn't lower the age of consent when the made abortions illegal it would cause suffering on a massive scale, in the millions probably. Looking at the states that have banned abortion completely, I can safely say I called it. The systems are overflowing with single mothers and vulnerable unprotected children. I'm sure the pedophiles are having a field day. And I wouldn't be surprised if a few here and there 'die' or just disappear to some kind of child sacrifice ritual or adrenochrome harvesting. The situation is already pretty bad in some states and it's only been a couple of years. Just wait 5 or 10 years from now. Who would have thought waging a war against families and biology would lead to so much suffering? But hey you get to virtue signal about 'protecting children!' so it's totally worth it. More like 'protecting the flow of children to pedophiles' and 'protecting Americans from having a stable nuclear family'.

And we can't forget about religion of course. Let's start with Christianity. What was Mary's age when she became pregnant with Jesus? 13 to 15? I guess that makes Saint Joseph a pedophile! Quick, somebody tell the Christians! But she wasn't impregnated by Joseph was she? She was impregnated by God. And do you really expect me to believe that God, the almighty himself, is a pedophile? That he's a predator?! Fucking insanity. I don't know what kind of Christian can justify calling God a predator, but some high profile self-proclaimed Christians have done exactly that. I'm not stupid enough to suggest such a thing, but some people are. I'm sure most of them know exactly what they are doing. We all know the reason god set the age of adulthood below the age of consent laws was to give the predators something to do right? I think everyone is familiar with Islam's stance on this. Marriage at 6-7 and sex at 9-10. But I feel like Islam goes full Connecticut, and you never go full Connecticut. I don't know the specifics on Judaism but I know they are in a similar boat with Christianity and Islam. So where does the rational for modern age of consent laws come from? There really isn't one from what I've seen. Just the satanists and communists repeating the same crap over and over again for 60 years until they have enough zombies parroting the nonsense. You can't expect people to return to a traditional way of life and marriage and make it illegal at the same time. 'You want 13-year olds to marry 35-year olds?!' If she's an adult actively pursuing men then yes. That age gap is getting a little uncomfortable for my taste, but it's better than the alternative. But I guess some Russian couple got married at 16 and 40 and are having a bunch of kids so maybe I'm being a little too conservative. Because she's at peak fertility she'll probably have 4 kids before she's even 18 and still look amazing because her body will actually fully recover at that age. 'That's horrible!' Why is an American having a bunch of children horrible? You're not going limit child suffering in this country and bring back traditional values and families without lowering the age of consent to something reasonable and making high school optional again. Without that it will be an endless war on biology because of the unnatural restrictions placed on people go against how we were designed. But some people want endless wars to create suffering and division, as many as possible actually.

On the topic of "child" porn it's funny to see articles come through about people getting arrested for child porn that give zero details. It's like, what, we're they holding on to a picture of an ex-girlfriend or something? The laws are so insane and anti-human that the charge itself doesn't actually mean anything. "Sex offender" is a good example. Did he bang some 16 year old who hit on him? Oh noes, the horror. Or buy a hooker? That's perfectly legal in most of the world. I guess if they locked up the hookers instead they couldn't fluff their yearly evaluations though, can't have that. But it's pretty funny to watch when the brainwashing doesn't take completely. There was a news article recently about a high school where quite a few people were sharing naked photos around of their girlfriends. Whoopsies! Better start culling the pedos now you have along list of people to go though! Something similar happened to me when I was younger. My first girlfriend, who was under 16 at the time, wanted to send me photos of herself using her phone/computer and I was forced to turn her down and inform her it was illegal to do so. If I lived in another country that didn't hate it's people so much I would've happily accepted that offer and possessed "child" porn. But don't worry, when I turned 18 that magical switch the government installed in my head flipped and I recognized how wrong that would have been.

p7

All those old pedophiles from previous generations used to say things like 'If you didn't find a woman in high school you were screwed (figuratively of course)' and 'Women who were single outside of high school were single for a reason'. With a lifetime of experience I can say that those statements are completely true. I have never once met a single marriageable woman over the age of 16 in my life. They're too crazy, too damaged already by previous relationships, and in some cases if they became adults sooner than the average, their best years could be gone already. Men who are desperate to start a family will still marry these women and are all surprised pikachu face when they get divorce raped or cheated on, if she doesn't just make most of the rest of their life miserable. She couldn't nail down a guy when she still had her best years so I'm sure there's nothing wrong with her. Unless you're rich or famous that is and even that's not a guarantee she won't get bored and decide to start getting her paychecks mailed. And as soon as you graduate high school guess what? All those women become illegal. So what is there to work towards? If you want a family with a woman who actually loves you and isn't just around for the paycheck you don't really have any options and nothing to look forward to in life. Well what about science? Science is effectively illegal. Everything is so heavily regulated (ie illegal for peasants) that you can't really experiment on much of anything that might up end the status quo. Some of the experiments themselves would actually be legal in most states, acquiring the materials is another matter. Weapons are effectively illegal as well. The only weapon technology we are allowed to buy is 100 years old at this point. It's still a deterrent to invasion in quantity, but that's not going to last much longer. And a far cry from what was intended in the constitution. Inventing new weapons is, again, illegal as they are by nature 'dangerous and unusual' and a violation of the NFA for a civilian to possess. Only the government is allowed to develop weapons, or have any kind of power, and you'll get the hand-me-downs when they feel you're allowed to have them, if ever. But I'm segwaying a bit here.

So to recap, pedophiles, at least organized pedophile rings, require what? Vulnerable and unprotected children. And what does having a malicious age of consent create? Vulnerable and unprotected children. And if you believe that wanting to have sex with someone "underage" is wrong you have to believe that everyone who's ever been to high school is a pedophile, that a million years of evolution some how got it wrong, that all the animals in the animal kingdom are pedophiles, that most of your ancestors and family are pedophiles, and that God the almighty was a predator. A good number of influential or high-profile streamers and Twitter accounts have come out and said something on this subject. So the next time you see some one of these people pushing this crap ask yourself, 'are they that stupid?' If the answer is 'no' then there's really only one thing they can be isn't there. Nothing in this rant should be construed as dictating how you should raise your family or the path through life your children should take. Or what age they should be allowed to do what, that's between them and their family. Not the government, media, or "education" system. If your daughters want to go through college instead of starting a family there's nothing wrong with that. But to force this on everyone else is fucking stupid. I've seen through a lifetime of experience and observation the suffering and evil this has created, and it's all artificial. If you're one of the (very) few non-pedos/satanists helping to push this agenda and support the age of consent in it's current form, the next time you see a suffering single mother, some poor child in foster care getting exploited or abused, dozens of children discovered abused in a pedophile ring, a lonely man in his 30's or 40s committing suicide (Nobody actually cares about this, I've only included it for the sake of completeness), or a crowd of people from broken families demanding socialism because they need someone to take care of them, pat yourself on the back, be proud of your accomplishments… because you created them. I'm far too old for any changes in the law to affect my life, but maybe some future generation won't have to deal with this bullshit, the evil it creates, and actually be free. I don't really have any say in how the country or world goes, but I can point out how stupid it is.