Anonymous ID: b802fd July 5, 2018, 4:18 p.m. No.2048099   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8135

One of the most, if not THE MOST, gaslit demographic on the jewish supremacism issue are the evangelicals, mainly due to the jewish psyop that is the Scofield Bible.

 

Redpilling the evangelicals on the jewish supremacism issue ASAP will speed up the great awakening considerably. It is useful to redpill them on the historical jewish hatred of Christians (pic related 1, 2, 3 and 4).

 

>Some resources regarding this:

1

https://youtu.be/-EdUJ10WF8c?t=1m33s

"James Perloff on Christian Zionism and the New World Order"

 

Description: "James Perloff returns to show discuss his articles "Producing A One World Religion: A Three Step Plan" and "The Abomination and Blasphemy of Christian Zionism.""

Starts at minute 1:33 .

 

James Perloff interviewed by Tim Kelly on Scofield and his bible's central role in creating the Christian Zionist movement.

 

>IMPORTANT

Circumcision is also relevant for the Evangelicals demographic.

Circumcision is male genital mutilation (which is obviously child abuse) and it results in

Anonymous ID: b802fd July 5, 2018, 4:21 p.m. No.2048155   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8171 >>8799

Another jewish manipulation based on falseness that seeks to gather the support of Christians is the term “judeo-Christian”, which is ans oxymoron. This is also very important to understand in order to be able to redpill the Evangelicals demographic on the issue of jewish-supremacism and subversion.

Listen to this audiobook for more info on this issue:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po_cSMoCZ6w

 

“Judaism's Strange Gods ~ Michael A. Hoffman”

Anonymous ID: b802fd July 5, 2018, 4:21 p.m. No.2048171   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8206

>>2048155

Reminder that Jesus was not a jew, he was an Israelite who got killed by jews for being against Usury.

 

If some shill tries to tell you that jews didn’t killed Jesus, it was the Romans, remember this quote from another anon:

 

“The Liberal Catholics of our country are now making another concession to Interfaith charity and Brotherhood benevolence. They are saying, "It was not the Jews who crucified Christ; it was the Romans."

I should like to ask these Liberal Catholics a few pointed questions on the subject of Our Lord's death.

Was it the Romans who came out to seize Him in the Garden of Olives with swords and clubs on the night of His Passion, and who brought Him bound to the High Priest, and then to Pontius Pilate, demanding that He should be killed?

Was it a Roman who betrayed Jesus with a kiss, and was it to Romans He was sold for thirty pieces of silver?

Was the High Priest a Roman, who rent his garments and accused Our Lord of blasphemy when He declared Himself to be the Eternal Son of God?

Was it a Roman crowd which stood before the tribunal of Pontius Pilate and shouted: "If this man were not a malefactor we would not have handed Him over to you … His blood be upon us and upon our children!"

Was it the Romans who disowned Jesus as the King of the Jews, and did not want the inscription placed over His head on the Cross when He hung, crowned with thorns, and with nails in His hands and His feet?

Was it God's judgement in Heaven that the Romans had killed Christ, and was that why the Power of the Almighty some thirty years later razed the Temple of Jerusalem to the ground, and left not one stone upon a stone, and has never allowed it to be rebuilt from that day to this?

In the prayers of the Mass for Good Friday of Holy Week, the priest refers to the "perfidious Jews" as the ones who betrayed and crucified Christ. Should he be saying the "perfidious Romans"? And has it been wrong for the Church to put it the first way for as long as her history?

When Our Lord hung upon the Cross, His first recorded words were, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do."

Do the Liberal Catholics really think Our Lord was referring to the Jews when He said, "They know not what they do"? Was it the Jewish Chief Priests, the Scribes, and the Ancients, with whom He sat daily teaching in the Temple and who, when He was crucified, wagged their heads and mocked Him and shouted: "He saved others; himself He cannot save" – was it these who knew not what they did, and whom Our Lord asked the Father to forgive?

Saint Luke tells us clearly that Jesus said this of the Roman soldiers who "dividing his garments, cast lots." And Saint Matthew tells us that these same Romans, after Jesus expired on the Cross, cried out in one voice with their Centurion, "Indeed, this was the Son of God!".”

 

And if a shill tries to tell you jews didn’t exist during Jesus time (they have said that moronish lie to me), just point them to this link and laugh at them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees

http://archive.is/3XtQD

Anonymous ID: b802fd July 5, 2018, 4:34 p.m. No.2048382   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2048206

Try harder. Your pilpul is powerless here, with the firing of the subversive BV now the people know the truth about jewish massive subversion and lies.

You lost :)

 

Also, for those that want to learn more, read the 2nd Chapter of the book "When Victims Rule". A sneak peak on pic related 1, with links for the chapter and the whole book there.

Anonymous ID: b802fd July 5, 2018, 4:50 p.m. No.2048685   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8743

>>2048595

Even if that was true, you use your "oh, it's just an accident those that are not accurate" wiggle room to silence autists who dig into the biggest threat to the West today: jewish supremacism and subversion.

 

You did it just so you have plausible deniability when you silence people who hurt your Israel first sensibilities.

 

And now you are trying to get on BO good side again with that pre-planned tactic of "It was just an accident, look, I was mostly accurate!" so you can silence counter-jewish-supremacism autists again.

 

Please, kindly remove yourself from the gene pool,k? Thnks bye.