Anonymous ID: fab55c Feb. 28, 2024, 12:55 p.m. No.20490965   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1039

>>20490944

Remember that whistleblower post about fedfags that tried to turn Pepe gay? Remember when you tried turning 40K gay? Now you're trying to turn Mr.Pig not just gay, but communist now too? You're less than the dirt on my shoes, clown. Filtered for being an infamy-fag.

Anonymous ID: fab55c Feb. 28, 2024, 1:05 p.m. No.20491044   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1049 >>1083 >>1097

Clowns are trying to create coincidences again, just like they tried faking Q proofs, this time assigning Q posts to Canadian military tweet timestamps. Exact same feel. Doesn't pass the sniff test.

Anonymous ID: fab55c Feb. 28, 2024, 1:10 p.m. No.20491068   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1087

>>20491049

>What are you talking about? I looked them up, they are real posts from the official accounts.

Like the clown bakers pushing to have them notabled? That kind of consent? What part of "No outside comms" did you fail to understand?

Anonymous ID: fab55c Feb. 28, 2024, 1:13 p.m. No.20491089   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1103 >>1124 >>1137 >>1149

>>20491075

> You look up the timestamp Q drop. We have been doing this for Years (as well as with POTUS and Dan).. apparently you're very, very new to the game.

Now I know you're a complete clown. "We" have been doing this for years, huh? Assigning Q posts to Canadian military tweet timestamps? For years?! You're not even a joke, you're just pathetic. Fuck off, retard.

Anonymous ID: fab55c Feb. 28, 2024, 1:19 p.m. No.20491130   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1152

>>20491109

That's a straw man deflection to not address why you think assigning a Q post to the timestamp of a Canadian military tweet should be notabled. If I'm a dumbass for pointing that out, what does that make you for posting it and trying to defend it?

Anonymous ID: fab55c Feb. 28, 2024, 1:24 p.m. No.20491171   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1194

>>20491149

>The convention as I understand it is that MilQ posts are important intelligence sources for anons and as such should be included in the Notables bun.

>I disagree whole-heartedly with fab55c

Gee, I wonder why. You wouldn't be trying to push to have it notabled, would you? Tying Q posts to the timestamps of Canadian military tweets is reaching pretty far this afternoon.

Anonymous ID: fab55c Feb. 28, 2024, 1:33 p.m. No.20491225   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20491194

Because I disagree with you and quote your own words that makes me a shill? Interesting. And then calling me a newfag or telling me to lurk is your best deflection? Yeah, I've seen this routine from you specifically before, dipshit. How long did you clowns work on that notable angle? Had you maybe stuck to just regular USMIL tweets then it may have flown under the radar, but trying to tie them to Canadian tweets arbitrarily and then claiming "we've" always done this kind of let the cat out of the bag. Better luck next time, stupid. Filtered.