Anonymous ID: 7de6ed July 5, 2018, 6:02 p.m. No.2049751   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2049677

Not totally, but their enough anons willing to look past/ignore it that won't hurt too much

 

personally, it makes me hesitant to invest more hours into digging what might just be 'dis-infomation''. Hundreds of man hours spent analyzing those china photos, for example; I just couldn't do it now knowing they could be faked too.

 

Also throws into question how close he/they really are to the president.

 

It's the movement that matters though. Most of what we've found is open-source and dug up by ANONS, not Q.