Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 4:41 p.m. No.20496548   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6554 >>6556

>>20496509

Now, Elon, there's someone else that gets bigly extra blowback around here.

So, RRN & Elon.

Who/What else gets what any other anon might consider over the top yeah just a bit much moar than normal hatred around here?

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 4:47 p.m. No.20496576   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20496566

Q followers can post away again without interference on that little SM toy he bought.

If he's compd so deep as you say then he sure has a funny way of showing it.

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 5:11 p.m. No.20496670   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6697 >>6728

>>20496655

The stale af TC from someone that used simple passwords like 'Matlock' and was always super vigilant about his opsec and mathematically impossible to deny proofs?

No biggie to just pop back out of the blue with none of the usual opsec/proof?

Ok, whatev.

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 5:33 p.m. No.20496758   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6768 >>6809

>>20496738

So, you're constantly adhom'ing an anon stating that Q used exceptionally sound opsec.

Dasting.

Treating Q coming back like nothing happened in 1.5 years and reusing the same old TC with no re-verification via PDJT is totally normal behavior by him.

Double dasting.

Yeah, I'll let other anons judge for themselves who's glowing the brightest in this exchange.

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 5:41 p.m. No.20496796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6812 >>6818

>>20496768

For Joe Blow on /pol/ that nobody gaf about?

As long as he wants it to be.

For someone like Q?

1 year tops and Q changed his less than that on average.

Look, the Glowies had to have been trying to crack it.

Did they succeed?

Odds say prolly but nobody here including me knows for sure.

The main point is Q never let things get to the possible part.

He was big on the whole mathematically impossible to deny approach.

To suddenly reappear and not even attempt to re-establish the opsec he always used is highly questionable.

To the extent that anyone questioning it being labeled as a shill/glowing is absurd.

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 5:46 p.m. No.20496819   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20496812

>well hopefully Q get's your memo

No, glowie, I read Q's memos and observed his actions.

He's the one that showed all us oldfags the lifespan of the most famous TCs ever used.

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 5:48 p.m. No.20496831   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6881

>>20496809

Yeah, that's a whole other fuckery deal that will make heads spin even further.

And to think it was one of the few people using TCs elsewhere at the time that noticed it.

That would could have gone undiscovered very easily.

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 5:56 p.m. No.20496884   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6909 >>7065

>>20496862

Oh, absolutely.

The OG days on /pol/ were hardcore.

Anons were like show us the sauce, Mr. Insider.

Fast forward to modern day QR where it's supposedly forbidden to point out such a drastic change in opsec by 2022 "Q".

>t. We've Come a Long Way, Baby!

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 6:20 p.m. No.20497035   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7055

>>20497022

Well, they're not wrong - they are newfags.

Besides, it's a Dim tradition to think simple word substitution sweeps it all under the rug.

They wouldn't have to rig elections if that were true.

Anonymous ID: f84277 Feb. 29, 2024, 6:27 p.m. No.20497086   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7223

>>20497065

Tranimae swears Freddy was a regular in the PTG threads when Q hit the scene.

I don't recall him then, but I wasn't in every one of those threads non-stop like he prolly was at the time.