Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 29, 2024, 7:08 p.m. No.20497315   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20497196 lb

 

Tell the furries to go home they have caused enuff madness.

 

also why do we have this line if it can't hold up in the supreme court.

"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase from the United States Declaration of Independence.[1] The phrase gives three examples of the unalienable rights which the Declaration says have been given to all humans by their Creator, and which governments are created to protect. Like the other principles in the Declaration of Independence, this phrase is not legally binding, but has been widely referenced and seen as an inspiration for the basis of governm

 

-----

 

Decision

Precedent

Subsequent developments

See also

References

Sources

External links

Jacobson v. Massachusetts

 

Article

Talk

Read

Edit

View history

 

Tools

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jacobson v. Massachusetts

 

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued December 6, 1904

Decided February 20, 1905

Full case name Henning Jacobson, plaintiff in error v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Citations 197 U.S. 11 (more)

25 S. Ct. 358, 49 L. Ed. 643, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 1232

Case history

Prior Defendant convicted, Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex (1902); judgment affirmed, Commonwealth v. Henning Jacobson, 183 Mass 242 (1903)

Holding

The police power of a state must be held to embrace at least such reasonable regulations established directly by legislative enactment to protect public health and safety.

Court membership

Chief Justice

Melville Fuller

Associate Justices

John M. Harlan · David J. Brewer

Henry B. Brown · Edward D. White

Rufus W. Peckham · Joseph McKenna

Oliver W. Holmes Jr. · William R. Day

Case opinions

Majority Harlan, joined by Fuller, Brown, White, McKenna, Holmes, Day

Dissent Brewer

Dissent Peckham

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state. Jacobson has been invoked in numerous other Supreme Court cases as an example of a baseline exercise of the police power.

 

if it can't be absolute then why have it in there?

it's like buying a 12 inch sub and it actually not being 12 inches……………..

Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 29, 2024, 9:22 p.m. No.20497788   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7800

>>20497746

u welcome love. Glad i could help show how lil minds need more self awareness of how they can't control their emotions. I will suggest a nice bath of reflection for you. muwahh :)

Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 29, 2024, 11:27 p.m. No.20498132   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20498099

<3 i can but who cares cuz i don't. make sure ur feelys stay in check. wouldn't wanna offend them to. oh right skinned knees never hurt wipe those tears