>>2050208 lb

You have valid points. I really don't know the reason he posted that pic. I can only guess. It could have been meant for (((them))) to actually troll them. We've been caught in the crossfire before. I expect it will happen again.

Hasn't there been other times things didn't make sense at the time, but 3-4 months later it did?

I don't know if there is anything anyone can say to overcome this pic fiasco. I hope you don't dwell on it too much. We'll see where we are at the end of this month. A promise was made. Hopefully, that one will be kept.

>>2050480

not a dumbfag for asking questions. Here's what Q said.

Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.

Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?

Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?

Image provided here has been distorted (stretched).

Q

It's more than likely it is the reflection off the back of a phone. The beauty of asking questions instead of making statements is plausible deniaility.

>>2050633

Can't say whether you are right or wrong because none of us know the answer, kek. It's a logical assumption. Can't find fault with it. I also believe it was not necessarily meant for us. Maybe one day we will get the answer. :)

>>2050803

FINALLY!!!

It's the first I've seen anyone bring up that AF1 is brand new. You wouldn't think it would be the same as the old one. Similar but not the same.

>>2050888

I Had to check as I thought it had already been built, but you are right. Won't be built anytime soon. I thought there were 2 AF1's. At least NCIS said there are 2, kek. Sauce is from CBSNews.

While the ultimate fate of the next-generation plane is unclear, the current Air Force One will continue to serve U.S. presidents through 2024. Join us for a photo tour of this most important plane.

>>2051072

you're an idiot.