Ben Bergquam And Oscar Ramirez Warn Of What's Approaching Our Southern Border

7:33

https://rumble.com/embed/v4du9s3/?pub=4

Jack Smith Asks DC Judge Boasberg to Decide What Trump Classified Doc Evidence to Show Florida Judge

March 1, 2024 | Sundance |

If you ever needed a good point to highlight the nature of political Lawfare, this is a great example.

Julie Kelly essentially notes that Special Prosecutor Jack Smith is asking DC Judge James Boasberg to decide what evidence should be given to Florida Judge Aileen Cannon.

Julie Kelly (Via Twitter) – “It appears thatrecords related to the grand jury proceedingsin DC on the classified docs caseremain under seal and have not been transmitted to Judge Cannon or defense.

Recall that almost the entire investigation into the classified docs matter took place in Washington DC–not southern FLA even though it is the controlling jurisdiction since the alleged “crime” of retaining classified records/national defense info happened at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach.

DOJ then Jack Smith kept the case in Trump-hating DC courthouse so they could get favorable rulings from then-chief judge Beryl Howell–which they did. For example, Howell cited the crime fraud exception to justify piercing atty-client privilege between Trump and his lawyer, Evan Corcoran, to force Corcoran to turn over his records to DOJ.

Highly unlikely that would have happened in FLA especially before Judge Cannon.But right before indictment, Jack Smith moved the case to Florida. Reports at the time indicated DOJ read summaries of its grand jury evidence to a FLA grand jury in order to secure the indictment.

So, how is it almost nine months post-indictment that trove of evidence remains under seal?When the issue was raised, David Harbach said DOJ was “in the process” of asking the current DC chief judge James Boasberg to review the file, add redactions if needed, and transmit to FLA court. (link)

There is a certain level of cognitive disassociation needed by the media to ignorehow the DOJ is using a DC court system to prosecute a Florida case against Trump. Go Deep on Boasberg HERE

Boasberg, an ally of SSCI Chairman Mark Warner, has intercepted several cases that brought sunlight upon the corrupt DC system.In each case Boasberg ruled in favor of maintaining the corruption, including his willfully blind support of the FBI searching NSA databases to conduct illegal surveillance of Americans, and includingBoasberg’s personal appointment of Mary McCordto run defense on behalf of the corrupt DOJ main office.

(They always used the captured judges…IF you want proof that almost every judge can be blackmailed or captured look to DC as proof. It happens in courts)

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/03/01/jack-smith-asks-dc-judge-boasberg-to-decide-what-trump-classified-doc-evidence-to-show-florida-judge/

Another Jack Smith major “head implosion” going down in 3… 2… 1…. 1/2

March 2, 2024 (16 hours ago)

Jack Smith is quickly “running out of runway”—a witty observation courtesy of Professor Turley. Lately, Smith finds himself repeatedly taking hits in the legal groin area. The first setback for Smith came when the Supreme Court decided to take up Trump’s “immunity case.” This move will probably extend the so-called “election interference” case well past the 2024 election. Bad, bad news for Jack.

Fox News:

Liberal media pundits and Democrats unloaded on the Supreme Court this week after it agreed to review whether former President Trump had immunity in the election interference case and one even described the decision as “supreme arrogance.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review whether Trump has immunity from prosecution in the Special Counsel’s federal election interference case.

The justices have fast-tracked the appeal and will hear oral arguments in late April, with a ruling on the merits expected by late June. Trump’s criminal trial has been put on hold pending resolution of the matter. Arguments will begin the week of April 22.

Turley pointed out that this essentially cuts Jack Smith’s runway so short that he won’t even manage to “lift off.”

Daily Caller:

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said Wednesday the Supreme Court gave former President Donald Trump a “real victory” by taking up the case of his presidential immunity.

The Supreme Court announced Wednesday it would take the case after Trump applied for a stay of an appeals court ruling that rejected his arguments that he had immunity from prosecution. Trump’s attorneys accused special counsel Jack Smith of having “a political motive” to try the case before the 2024 presidential election.

“The real victory here for Trump deals with the calendar,” Turley told “Special Report” host Bret Baier. “You know, the overriding push of Smith, the special counsel, has been to get a trial before the election. He is running out of runway. If this opinion doesn’t come out until June, perhaps, you have to remember that even if Smith wins,the mandate goes back to the district court, which has to handle all the pre-trial motions. That could take months.”

The Supreme Court set oral arguments for the week of April 22, around the time the court will hear arguments about the application of a charge the Justice Department has used against many of those arrested and charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol building. Smith secured a four-count indictment against Trump in August related to the former president’s efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 election.

Jack’s main hope hinges on securing a conviction before the 2024 election, but it seems he’s run straight into a massive MAGA roadblock.And that’s not the end of his troubles. He’s bracing for another significant setback in the Trump classified documents case, particularly with ajudge calling him out over the “death threats” he’s been citing without showing any solid proof. Investigative journalist Julie Kelly is on top of this recent twist, revealinghow Jack’s efforts to redact and conceal certain individuals are unraveling fast.Be prepared for another left-wing head implosion in 3… 2… 1…

Here’s what Julie had to say on X:

Afternoon hearing in classified docs case in FLA ended around 3pm. As expected, both sides clashed over unsealing redacted information–Trump wants swath of discovery unsealed, Jack Smith does not–with Judge Cannon pressing both sides for clarity.

Cannon is no nonsense, very low key, only got animated once or twice.

The biggest dispute was over the release of names of witnesses and their statements.Jack Smith’s team wants names and statements kept secret–prosecutor David Harbach claimed that witnesses are harassed, intimidated, and threatened“in any case where Donald Trump is a defendant.”

https://revolver.news/2024/03/another-jack-smith-major-head-implosion-going-down-in-3-2-1/

>>20507122

2/2

Cannon pushed back on that claim, arguing that it would be “unprecedented” to keep names of witnesses and their substantive statements under seal in court motions –particularly names and statements of government officials

Cannon said she understood the need to protect the safety of witnesses but that it is “not possible to shield everyone from the internet.”She had asked for proof of legitimate threats to potential witnesses; Smith’s team came back with one example(they also tried to keep under seal) of a potential witness who received social media “threats” after the indictment was announced.

Useful to note Judge Cannon is the only official involved in any of the Trump cases that received death threats legit enough to land one woman in prison:

Witness lists are made public before trial–even Smith’s team acknowledged that reality. DOJ just resists making the list and statements public now.

At first,DOJ said it had 87 potential government witnesses (they also asked to file that list under seal months ago, Cannon said no.)

Now Smith’s team says it willcall 40 witnesses and wants the names of 25 witnesses redacted.

Defense also wants Mar-a-Lago application and search warrant fully redacted.

Also some thornier and as Judge Cannon and Smith’s team acknowledged “complicated” 1A considerations in releasing discovery materials. There is a protective order in place as well (common practice) but Smith’s team sort of apologized at the beginning for over-relying on the protective order to keep filings under seal. “We could have done a better job. We are owning that,” Harbach said.

Recall thatJack Smith used the “witness intimidation” claim to seek a gag order preventing Trumpfrom making public statements about “prospective witnesses” in the DC J6 case. Chutkan agreed but the DC appellate court tweaked that part of her gag order to only prevent Trump from making derogatory public comments about potential witnesses about the case.

My guess is Cannon agrees to redact a good chunk of the motion to compel and limits release of witness names/statements to government officials, past or present.Then we will really see Jack Smith’s head explode bc that is EXACTLY what he wants to conceal.

You can read more about Julie’s investigative work below:

‘Disturbing’ Collusion Between Biden White House and Trump Prosecutors

How is President Trump supposed to mount a credible defense if he’s kept in the dark about the evidence that’s supposedly “stacked against him?”

This is thekind of strategy you see when there’s no solid case to begin with, just a desperate hope that something, anything, will stick. It’s yet more proof that we’re dealing with a regime behaving like North Korea, trying to sideline their more popular political rivals by any means necessary, including imprisonment. It’s mind-boggling to think this is actually happening in the United States of America, and it shows just how evil and dark our government has truly become.

https://revolver.news/2024/03/another-jack-smith-major-head-implosion-going-down-in-3-2-1/

Watch both

Big Fish@BigFish3000

Whomever told Joe Biden it was a good idea to go to the border the same day Trump went. I want to thank you. 😎

From

Collin Rugg

9:01 PM · Feb 29, 2024

Honestly, a big shoutout to whoever thought it was a smart move to have Biden visit the border on the same day as President Trump. Seriously, THANK YOU. It provided the stark contrast that Americans truly needed to witness.

https://x.com/BigFish3000/status/1763384095692693745

Here’s another striking contrast between the two. Biden chose his border visit to chat about climate change, of all things, while President Trump focused on something much more immediate and heart-wrenching: Laken Riley. She was the young nursing student brutally murdered by one of Biden’s pet illegals.

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

@CRRJA5

·FollowCompare and Contrast

Both go to the border

Biden talks climate change and calls us Neanderthals 😳

Trump talks about illegals and the murder of Laken Riley🥵

https://x.com/CRRJA5/status/1763616240638038254

Canada defends placing citizens under house arrest on suspicion they MIGHT commit a hate crime in the future…

March 1, 2024 (2 days ago).1/2

Canada is lost. For a real-time example of communism hitting its stride, just look at what’s unfolding with the Canadian government’s latest actions—tyranny personified. They’re pushing a law that’s nothing short of draconian, allowing them to confine citizens to their homes on mere “suspicion” of potential future hate crimes. What this bill essentially does is put an end to free speech online, setting a sinister, tyrannical precedent that other countries might be tempted to follow, aiming to quash free speech and silence political dissent. Trudeau’s latest move uses “protecting kids” and championing “democracy” as justifications for destroying your rights. What’s truly alarming is how many Americans will eventually embrace this kind of tyranny. A large portion of our population is eager to have Big Brother’s boot on their necks. Constitutional lawyers in Canada are already raising red flags galore about this new bill, signaling a dire warning that freedom on the internet could be at stake for Canadians—and potentially, the rest of the world.

LifeSiteNews:

A top constitutional lawyer warned that the federal government’s Online Harms Act to further regulate the internet will allow a new digital safety commission to conduct “secret commission hearings” against those found to have violated the new law, raising “serious concerns for the freedom of expression” of Canadians online.

Marty Moore, who serves as the litigation director for the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms-funded Charter Advocates Canada, told LifeSiteNews on Tuesday that Bill C-63 will allow for the “creation of a new government agency with a broad mandate to promote ‘online safety’ and target ‘harmful content.’”

“The use of the term ‘safety’ is misleading, when the government through Bill C-63 is clearly seeking to censor expression simply based on its content, and not on its actual effect,” he told LifeSiteNews.

Moore noted that the bill will also “open doors for government regulation to target undefined psychological harm.”

The new government bill was introduced Monday by Justice Minister Arif Virani in the House of Commons and passed its first reading.

Bill C-63 will create the Online Harms Act and modify existing laws, amending the Criminal Code as well as the Canadian Human Rights Act, in what the Liberals under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau claim will target certain cases of internet content removal, notably those involving child sexual abuse and pornography.

Details of the new legislation to regulate the internet show the bill could lead to more people jailed for life for “hate crimes” or fined $50,000 and jailed for posts that the government defines as “hate speech” based on gender, race, or other categories.

The bill calls for the creation of a digital safety commission, a digital safety ombudsperson, and the digital safety office.

This “digital ombudsperson” will be responsible for monitoring online behavior and holding people “accountable.” The Lifesite piece goes on:

He said that while the Commission’s reach is “only vaguely undefined,” it would have the power to regulate anyone who operates a “social media service” that “has a yet-to-be-designated number of users or is “deemed a regulated service by the government without regard to the number of users.”

According to the Trudeau government, Bill C-63 aims to protect kids from online harms and crack down on non-consensual deep-fake pornography involving children and will target seven types of online harms, such as hate speech, terrorist content, incitement to violence, the sharing of non-consensual intimate images, child exploitation, cyberbullying and inciting self-harm…

https://revolver.news/2024/03/canada-defends-placing-citizens-under-house-arrest-on-suspicion-they-might-commit-a-hate-crime-in-the-future/

https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1763494971963764856?s=20

>>20507370

2/2

The left has a pattern of pulling the “kids” and “democracy” cards to back up their aggressive anti-freedom moves. That’s the direction this bill is taking—opening doors to warrants, secretive hearings, and hefty fines. Yet, what’s truly alarming about this bill is the part where they can detain you based on the suspicion that you might commit a hate crime down the road. The Canadian government stands by this, arguing it’s a preventive measure against radicalization and the spread of harmful ideologies online.

Russell Brand knows that the West is lost. We’re no longer free.

And just in case you didn’t realize it, the people who want to bulldoze your freedoms are not the good guys. Here’s what folks online are saying about this new move:

“How do we deradicalize the people who are learning things from the MSM?”

“He’s just radicalized me more. How is this possible?”

“The way he is speaking seems pretty radical to me.”

“Well, considering he’s doing obstruction of justice as we speak let’s start with him”

“The person is sick. You cannot explain this behaviour any other way. Evil is too soft.”

“A life sentence for hurt feelings; sounds like a Liberal plan.”

Sure, because there’s nothing like charging people with crimes they might commit in the future to really “deradicalize” them. This is the direction the globalist agenda is steering towards. When persuasion fails, intimidation becomes the strategy of choice. This tactic is already at play in the US—just take a look at the treatment of the J6 detainees. It’s a clear signal from our government: step out of line with the official regime narrative, and your life is over.

Welcome to the “reeducation camp” phase of the globalist playbook.

https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1763494971963764856?s=20

https://revolver.news/2024/03/canada-defends-placing-citizens-under-house-arrest-on-suspicion-they-might-commit-a-hate-crime-in-the-future/https://revolver.news/2024/03/canada-defends-placing-citizens-under-house-arrest-on-suspicion-they-might-commit-a-hate-crime-in-the-future/https://revolver.news/2024/03/canada-defends-placing-citizens-under-house-arrest-on-suspicion-they-might-commit-a-hate-crime-in-the-future/https://revolver.news/2024/03/canada-defends-placing-citizens-under-house-arrest-on-suspicion-they-might-commit-a-hate-crime-in-the-futuhttps://x.com/WeAreCanProud/status/1763301866698576259?s=20

Mike Benz

@MikeBenzCyber

==3 Key Points from my Fox News radio hit this morning with

@DrewSteeleRadio on the CIA, Ukraine & the New York Times:==

1. "The CIA invited the New York Times in." They specifically say in the NYT article that many of the NYT's 200-some interviews were done inside the physical building of one the 12 secret CIA bases in Eastern Ukraine – which means this wasn't a scoop, it was an invitation & base tour from the CIA invited them in for the express purpose of getting that piece published.

1. "This is a dirty trick by our Central Intelligence Agency to use the New York Times as its own personal mouthpiece, to protect its own personal piggy bank." This is the selective leaking of intelligence just to get short-term funding. The key paragraph in the NYT piece gives away the game that the bases are all praying for more funding. The whole article is about how important these CIA bases have become and what catastrophe will befall them if Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson vetoes the hotly contested new Ukraine funding bill.

1. The NYT article reveals those CIA bases are not just defensive – they are for offensive scouting of targets to hit within Russia proper. That's not defending Americans or even Ukrainians: long range missiles are for killing Russians. Beyond such offensive operations not being mission critical, they're a provocation to war. And they were set up years before 2022.

9:06 PM · Feb 27, 2024

·

704.8K

Views

https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1762660463249068342?s=20

>>20507420

>>20507420

Confirmation everything Russia has said about Ukraine, the US, EU countries are true. They all worked together to take down the elected leader of Ukraine. And how the DOJ and CIA has been running it since at least 2014

Second if Russia can intercept the German’s communications yesterday, the FSB know exactly where the CIA 12 outposts are in Ukraine and what they are doing. I have no doubt about this.

This brings up the case of Nord Stream 2