WEF gardening bunArchived some just in case they try to 180 and say home gardens are bad for the climate. There may be more but this was what I found on first 4 pages of search engine.
https://archive.fo/RA6ii These bus stops are a sanctuary for bees
https://archive.fo/SlZ5r How gardens can boost biodiversity and help tackle climate change
https://archive.fo/qBDCo Community gardens boost well-being and biodiversity
https://archive.fo/WuV5U Rooftop gardens can help alleviate heat in cities, study finds
https://archive.fo/eebhH Why urban gardens are a lifeline for the world's pollinators
https://archive.fo/S2swn The mini-gardens cheering up London's commuters
https://archive.fo/3wUgM How Mexico is protecting its hummingbird population
https://archive.fo/gIWHY Community gardens can fight food insecurity and boost tolerance
https://archive.fo/AQeZv Experts think putting plants in your garden could be as effective as mindfulness at reducing stress
https://archive.fo/pF3Gv Grow your own: Urban farming is flourishing during the coronavirus lockdowns
https://archive.fo/WJ8d4 Pollinators are struggling to survive - these gardening tips can help them
https://archive.fo/ky6di This is how to reap the benefits of making our cities greener
https://archive.fo/sLZPl What are the UN's plans for developing and managing more urban forests
https://archive.fo/zlgiF Cities are warming 29% faster than rural areas. Could urban greening fix this?
>>20507429 pb
>WEF going after your personal gardens
>>20507468 pb
>bullshit
It may not be on the WEF website, but can see them potentially gearing up towards this. Archived a bunch of WEF shit just in case they go through with it later, for DefiantL's and such.
This
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/22/carbon-footprint-homegrown-food-allotment-increase/
"The study, published in the journal Nature Cities, recruited 73 urban agriculture sites around the world, including Europe, the US, and the UK, and conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment on the site’s infrastructure, irrigation and supplies.
Fruit was found to be 8.6 times more eco-friendly when grown conventionally compared to in a city, whereas vegetables were 5.8 times better for the environment when left to the professionals.
But some crops have a lower carbon footprint than others and can help green-fingered members of the public make their allotment or garden better for the environment.
Tomatoes grown domestically, for example, have a lower carbon footprint than conventional farming, as does asparagus.
A serving of urban tomatoes makes, on average, 0.17kg of CO2, compared to 0.27kg in a conventional farm which would use an energy-intensive greenhouse.
Likewise asparagus, which is most often flown in from abroad and thousands of air miles, is a source of large carbon emissions if grown conventionally."
So at a minimum, they may try to choose what you can grow and what you cannot. Or so they would like